Cited by 239Innovative Education and Learning PracticesManagement and Organizational StudiesEducation, Philosophy, and Society

Practice? It’s a Matter of Taste!

Gherardi, Silvia·2009·Management Learning

Abstract

This article aims to enhance our understanding of how practice is socially sustained, learnt and constantly refined by arguing that practice is much more than a set of activities—it involves, beside instrumental and ethical judgements, taste and appraisal. Taste is a sense of what is aesthetically fitting within a community of practitioners—a preference for ‘the way we do things together’. Taste is based on subjective attachment to the object of practice and is learnt and taught as part of becoming a practitioner; it is performed as a collective, situated activity within a practice. The elaboration of taste and the refining of practice within a community involves taste-making, which is based on ‘sensible knowledge’ and the continual negotiation of aesthetic categories. The article examines how in a variety of practices, taste-making occurs through three processes: sharing a vocabulary for appraisal; crafting identities within epistemic communities; and refining performances.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1350507609340812

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gherardi, S.
Affiliations
University of Trento (IT)
Corresponding author
Gherardi, Silvia
Venue
Management Learning
Published
2009-10-21
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
535-550
ISSN
  • 1350-5076 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7307
OpenAlex
W2035864464
Cited by
239
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 19
FWCI
34.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Management Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
Keywords
practice, taste, taste-making, aesthetic categories, sensible knowledge, appraisal, epistemic communities, professional identity, learning in practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review