Cited by 859Organizational Learning and LeadershipInnovative Education and Learning PracticesManagement and Organizational Studies

Practice-Based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations

Gherardi, Silvia·2000·Organization

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/135050840072001

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gherardi, S.
Affiliations
University of Trento (IT)
Corresponding author
Gherardi, Silvia
Venue
Organization
Published
2000-05
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
211-223
ISSN
  • 1350-5084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7323
OpenAlex
W2014432022
Cited by
859
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 48
FWCI
19.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organization (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
organizational learning, organizational knowledge, practice theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review