Practice-Based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
From knowledge and learning perspectives, the opacity of AI tools can be seen as inhibiting knowledge workers' full feedback and reflective cycles.
“From knowledge and learning perspectives, the opacity of AI tools can be seen as inhibiting knowledge workers' full feedback and reflective cycles (Gherardi 2000, Schön 1983).”
From To Engage or Not to Engage with AI for Critical Judgments: How Professionals Deal with Opacity When Using AI for Medical Diagnosis (2022) · cites this paper as Gherardi 2000
Cites
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 33,219 · see citing works
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271 · see citing works
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645 · see citing works
Organizational Learning: Diverging Communities of Practice?
Easterby-Smith, M., Snell, R., & Gherardi, S. (1998) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507698293001 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lebovitz, S., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., & Levina, N. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1549 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
Practice? It’s a Matter of Taste!
Gherardi, S. (2009) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507609340812 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Self-citationWorkplace 'learning' and adult education: Messy objects, blurry maps and making difference
Fenwick, T. (2010) · European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults · doi:10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela0006 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Organizational knowledge, learning and memory – A perspective of an immune system
Huang, J.-J. (2013) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1057/kmrp.2011.48 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Approaches to learning in the context of work – workplace learning and human resources
Brandi, U., & Iannone, R. L. (2021) · Journal of Workplace Learning · doi:10.1108/jwl-01-2020-0015 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gherardi, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Trento (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Gherardi, Silvia
- ORCID
- Gherardi, Silvia
- Venue
- Organization
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 211-223
- ISSN
- 1350-5084 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7323
- OpenAlex
- W2014432022
- Cited by
- 859
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 19.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Keywords
- organizational learning, organizational knowledge, practice theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review