The DOI matches its Crossref record; 124 of the 124 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
`Mobilizing Masculinities': Women's Experiences of Men at
Abstract
To understand gender relations in organizations, I use feminist standpoint theory and critical scholarship on men and masculinities to guide an analysis of accounts from six women about their experiences with/interpretations of men at work. Restricting these accounts to those in which women perceived men as not intending harm to themselves or other women, I conclude that men routinely act in concert to `mobilize masculinities' at work, that men routinely conflate masculinities and work dynamics, that often men are only liminally aware of mobilizing masculinities, and that women experience masculinities mobilization, especially when conflated with work, as harmful. The discussion notes how the gender institution makes men's masculinities mobilizing behavior possible, and shapes women's interpretations and experiences of these behaviors. To subvert gender practices that harm people, I call for more research on how these practices are mobilized and conflated with work relations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
(1993) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(93)92196-5 · Cited by 11,976
WEST, C., & ZIMMERMAN, D. H. (1987) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002 · Cited by 8,954
HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES: A Theory of Gendered Organizations
ACKER, J. (1990) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124390004002002 · Cited by 7,374
Men and Women of the Corporation.
Strauss, G., & Kanter, R. M. (1978) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2522922 · Cited by 7,288
Lukes, S. (2005) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,653
Men and Women of the Corporation
Devanna, M. A. (1978) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/002188637801400208 · Cited by 6,354
(1987) · Cited by 3,394
Burawoy, M. (1998) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00040 · Cited by 2,916
The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology.
Sprague, J., & Smith, D. E. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073155 · Cited by 2,455
Cited by
Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243205278639 · Cited by 9,367
“Said and Done” Versus “Saying and Doing”: Gendering Practices, Practicing Gender at Work
Martin, P. Y. (2003) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243203017003002 · Cited by 721
Self-citationZanoni, P., Janssens, M., Benschop, Y., & Nkomo, S. (2010) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508409350344 · Cited by 593
Sexual Harassment, Workplace Authority, and the Paradox of Power
McLaughlin, H., Uggen, C., & Blackstone, A. (2012) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122412451728 · Cited by 538
‘There Oughtta Be a Law Against Bitches’: Masculinity Lessons in Police Academy Training
Prokos, A., & Padavic, I. (2002) · Gender, Work & Organization · doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00168 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, P. Y.
- Venue
- Organization
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 587-618
- ISSN
- 1350-5084 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7323
- OpenAlex
- W2052171419
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 124
- FWCI
- 19.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: `Mobilizing Masculinities': Women's Experiences of Men at. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/135050840184003
- The paper
- Martin, P. Y. (2001). `Mobilizing Masculinities': Women's Experiences of Men at. Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840184003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
