Disease specific quality of life instruments in multiple sclerosis: Validation of the Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis (HAQUAMS)
Abstract
Quality of life (QoL) is discussed as an additional outcome measure in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, few questionnaires assessing disease specific QoL in MS have been published. On the basis of the literature and interviews with clinicians and MS patients, we have developed a disease specific QoL instrument and validated it in a broad range of patients with MS. In this study, a heterogeneous sample of n = 237 MS patients completed the newly developed Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis (HAQUAMS, in German language) and a battery of already validated questionnaires. They further underwent neurological scoring and objective tests. By these means, we investigated its validity, appropriateness, internal consistency, and retest reliability. Internal consistency and retest coefficients were high and satisfied psychometric standards. Convergent and discriminant validity was supported by direction, magnitude and pattern of correlations with other health measures. HAQUAMS subscales and its total score distinguished between patient groups of varied disease severity, cognitive impairment, and affective symptomatology. No floor or ceiling effects were found in either of the HAQUAMS subscales. The HAQUAMS is a reliable, valid and appropriate instrument for QoL assessment in multiple sclerosis. Data of responsiveness are currently being obtained.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis is well-validated and exhibits low to moderate sensitivity to change.
“Well-validated, it exhibits low to moderate sensitivity to change.27,28”
From MS quality of life, depression, and fatigue improve after mindfulness training: A randomized trial (2010) · cites this paper as [27]
Cites
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., Haes, J. C. J. M. D., et al. (1993) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 · Cited by 16,005 · see citing works
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011 · see citing works
A health-related quality of life measure for multiple sclerosis
Vickrey, B. G., Hays, R. D., Harooni, R., Myers, L. W., & Ellison, G. W. (1995) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/bf02260859 · Cited by 1,132 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MS quality of life, depression, and fatigue improve after mindfulness training: A randomized trial
Grossman, P., Kappos, L., Gensicke, H., D'Souza, M., Mohr, D. C., Penner, I. K., & Steiner, C. (2010) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181f4d80d · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Fischer, A., Schröder, J., Vettorazzi, E., Wolf, O. T., Pöttgen, J., Lau, S., Heesen, C., Moritz, S., & Gold, S. M. (2015) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(14)00049-2 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationRandomised controlled trial of a self-guided online fatigue intervention in multiple sclerosis
Pöttgen, J., Moss-Morris, R., Wendebourg, J.-M., Feddersen, L., Lau, S., Köpke, S., Meyer, B., Friede, T., Penner, I.-K., Heesen, C., et al. (2018) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2017-317463 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Self-citationInformation provision for people with multiple sclerosis
Köpke, S., Solari, A., Khan, F., Heesen, C., & Giordano, A. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008757.pub2 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationRiemann-Lorenz, K., Motl, R. W., Casey, B., Coote, S., Daubmann, A., & Heesen, C. (2021) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2020.1731612 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationSilveira, S. L., Riemann-Lorenz, K., Heesen, C., & Motl, R. W. (2021) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-020-09946-w · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Gold, S. M., Heesen, C., Schulz, H., Guder, U., Mönch, A., Gbadamosi, J., Buhmann, C., & Schulz, K. H.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- Venue
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-130
- ISSN
- 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0970
- OpenAlex
- W2114796009
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, quality of life, disease-specific quality of life, questionnaire validation, psychometric properties, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, cognitive impairment, affective symptoms, disease severity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Quality of Life, Reproducibility of Results, Sickness Impact Profile
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review