Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anti-MOG antibodies plead against MS diagnosis in an Acquired Demyelinating Syndromes cohort

Ketelslegers, Immy A, Van Pelt, Daniëlle E, Bryde, Susanne, Neuteboom, Rinze F, Catsman-Berrevoets, Coriene E, Hamann, Dörte, Hintzen, Rogier Q·2015·Multiple Sclerosis Journal

Abstract

Background: Acquired demyelinating syndromes (ADS) in children are a group of distinct first immune-mediated demyelinating events of the central nervous system (CNS). Predictive biomarkers for future diagnosis are lacking. A putative target antigen is myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG). We analyzed the presence of MOG antibodies in a cohort of ADS patients in The Netherlands. Methods: Using a cell-based assay, we analyzed 117 children with ADS from a nationwide cohort, whom were divided into five groups: optic neuritis (ON; n = 20), transverse myelitis (TM; n = 7), other monofocal ADS ( n = 22), polyfocal ADS without encephalopathy ( n = 44) and polyfocal ADS with encephalopathy ( n = 24). Additionally, we tested children with other neurological diseases (OND; n = 13), healthy children ( n = 31) and adult polyfocal ADS plus encephalopathy (ADEM) patients ( n = 29). Results: We found that 21 of the 117 children with ADS tested anti-MOG seropositive (18%). The group of patients with ADEM had the highest prevalence of anti-MOG seropositivity (42% versus 18% in the non-encephalopathic polyfocal ADS patients). Although 47 ADS children had a final diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS), in only one of them were MOG antibodies detected (2%), with only borderline positivity. Only 1 out of the 29 adult ADEM patients tested anti-MOG seropositive. Conclusions: MOG antibodies are strongly skewed towards ADS children that present with an ADEM-like disease onset. The presence of such antibodies pleads against a future diagnosis of MS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1352458514566666

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Ketelslegers, I. A., Van Pelt, D. E., Bryde, S., Neuteboom, R. F., Catsman-Berrevoets, C. E., Hamann, D., & Hintzen, R. Q.
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Published
2015-02-06
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
1513-1520
ISSN
  • 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0970
OpenAlex
W2059045887
Cited by
179
References
3
FWCI
19.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anti-MOG antibodies plead against MS diagnosis in an Acquired Demyelinating Syndromes cohort. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1352458514566666
The paper
Ketelslegers, I. A., Van Pelt, D. E., Bryde, S., Neuteboom, R. F., Catsman-Berrevoets, C. E., Hamann, D., & Hintzen, R. Q. (2015). Anti-MOG antibodies plead against MS diagnosis in an Acquired Demyelinating Syndromes cohort. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458514566666

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.