The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emotion Discourse
Abstract
Discursive psychology is defined and illustrated in terms of how people describe and invoke emotions in everyday talk and text. Materials from counselling sessions and newspaper texts show how emotion descriptions are used in narrative accounts and explanations, both in building and in undermining the sensibility of a person’s actions. It is suggested that, rather than stemming from fixed cognitive scenarios that define what each emotion word means, emotion discourse deploys a flexible range of oppositions and contrasts that are put to service in the situated rhetoric of description and counter-description, narrative and counter-narrative. The rich variety and situated uses of emotion words and metaphors suggest a set of rhetorical affordances in which different parts or potentials of meaning, even contrasting ones for the same word, may be worked up and deployed. The article works with a tentative list of 10 rhetorical contrasts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Semantics, Culture, and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations
Wierzbicka, A. (1992) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195073256.001.0001 · Cited by 934
Script Formulations: An Analysis of Event Descriptions in Conversation
Edwards, D. (1994) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x94133001 · Cited by 284
Self-citationEmotion, language, and cultural scripts.
Wierzbicka, A. (2004) · Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence. · doi:10.1037/10152-004 · Cited by 275
Cited by
More than just a brain: emotions and the doctoral experience
Cotterall, S. (2013) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.680017 · Cited by 118
Current emotion research in social psychology: thinking about emotions and other people.
Parkinson, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2015) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073915590624 · Cited by 99
Defining Infidelity in Research and Couple Counseling: A Qualitative Study
Moller, N. P., & Vossler, A. (2015) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/0092623x.2014.931314 · Cited by 85
Hoemann, K., Nielson, C., Yuen, A., Gurera, J. W., Quigley, K. S., & Barrett, L. F. (2021) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000327 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Edwards, D.
- Venue
- Culture & Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 271-291
- ISSN
- 1354-067X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7056
- OpenAlex
- W4235861542
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 26.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emotion Discourse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1354067x9953001
- The paper
- Edwards, D. (1999). Emotion Discourse. Culture & Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x9953001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.