Cited by 934Categorization, perception, and languageLanguage and CultureLanguage, Metaphor, and Cognition

Semantics, Culture, and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations

Wierzbicka, Anna·1992

Abstract

To what extent are languages ‘essentially the same’? Is every word in our language translatable into every other language, or are some of our words and concepts ‘culture specific’? In this innovative study, Wierzbicka ranges across a wide variety of languages and cultures, attempting to identify concepts which are truly universal, while at the same time arguing that every language constitutes a different ‘guide to reality’. The lexicons of different languages, she shows, do indeed suggest different conceptual universes. Not everything that can be said in one language can be said in another, and this is not just a matter of certain things being easier to say in one language than in another. Wierzbicka focuses on a few specific classes of words. One chapter looks at the language of emotion across cultures, and finds that there are numerous culture-specific words for feelings and emotions which have no analogues in other cultures. Another chapter considers moral concepts across cultures. A third examines names and titles. In her concluding chapter, Wierzbicka analyses the ways in which the Russian language and Australian English serve as mirrors of their respective cultures and ‘national characters’. Clearly and accessibly written, this important new study will be of great interest to scholars working in a wide range of disciplines, including linguistics, anthropology, philosophy, psychology and literary studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780195073256.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wierzbicka, A.
Corresponding author
Wierzbicka, Anna
Published
1992-10-22
OpenAlex
W4388117266
Cited by
934
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 148 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 15
FWCI
5.93
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Keywords
cross-cultural semantics, culture-specific concepts, conceptual universals, vocabulary, emotional words, moral concepts, Russian language, Australian English, language and culture, cognitive linguistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review