The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Nationalization of Parties and Party Systems: An Empirical Measure and an Application to the Americas
Abstract
Political parties and party systems exhibit widely varying degrees of nationalization, that is the extent to which a party receives similar levels of electoral support throughout the country. The level of party nationalization has a prominent effect on such important factors as the survival of democracy, the types of issues that dominate political competition, legislative behaviour and public policy. In spite of its importance, party nationalization has been neglected in the comparative politics literature. Our article makes two contributions. First, it provides a measure of party and party system nationalization, based on the Gini coefficient, that is superior for comparative analysis to those employed to date. Second, it utilizes these measures to analyse nationalization in 17 democracies in the Americas, the first time nationalization has been examined empirically outside the advanced industrial democracies. The measure underscores the widely varying degrees in nationalization across party systems, within party systems over time, across parties within countries and within parties over time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-4135 · Cited by 7,983
The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,262
Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis
Scott, R. K., Warr, P. K., & Sartori, G. (1977) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.2307/447948 · Cited by 4,027
Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems
Cox, G. W. (1997) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174954 · Cited by 2,281
Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration
Nagata, J., & Lijphart, A. (1979) · International Journal · doi:10.2307/40201796 · Cited by 2,255
Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945-1990
Lijphart, A. (1994) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198273479.001.0001 · Cited by 1,760
Making votes count: strategic coordination in the world's electoral systems
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-2982 · Cited by 1,753
Seats and votes. The effects and determinants of electoral systems
Berg, S. (1990) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/0176-2680(90)90044-j · Cited by 1,627
The Methods and Materials of Demography.
Stockwell, E. G., Shryock, H. S., & Siegel, J. S. (1973) · Demography · doi:10.2307/2060757 · Cited by 1,165
Electoral systems and party systems: a study of twenty-seven democracies, 1945-1990
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-1188 · Cited by 1,126
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, M. P., & Mainwaring, S.
- Venue
- Party Politics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 139-166
- ISSN
- 1354-0688 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3683
- OpenAlex
- W2145081646
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 84.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Nationalization of Parties and Party Systems: An Empirical Measure and an Application to the Americas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/13540688030092002
- The paper
- Jones, M. P., & Mainwaring, S. (2003). The Nationalization of Parties and Party Systems: An Empirical Measure and an Application to the Americas. Party Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688030092002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.