Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,255

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration

Nagata, Judith, Lijphart, Arend·1979·International Journal

Abstract

While it may be difficult to achieve and maintain stable democratic governments in countries with deep religious, ideological, linguistic, cultural, or ethnic cleavages, Lijphart argues that it is not at all impossible. Through the analysis of political systems in six continents, he demonstrates that what he calls consociational democracy can be successful in severely divided or plural societies. Here, once again, Arend Lijphart is directing our attention to matters which will surely engage much of the attention of students of comparative politics in the next decade. G. Bingham Powell, Jr., American Political Science Review A study which can speak to such a wide audience in political science deserves a warm welcome from the profession. Government and Opposition A copybook example of the comparative method of political analysis, as well as indispensable reading for all who have an interest in the nature and prospects of representative democracy, whether in Europe or beyond.-The Times Higher Education Supplement This well-written work, containing a wealth of information on politics of many diverse nations, is highly recommended.-Library Journal

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/40201796

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,255

Metadata

Authors
Nagata, J., & Lijphart, A.
Venue
International Journal
Published
1979
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
505
ISSN
0020-7020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057238339
Cited by
2,255
References
0
FWCI
78.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/40201796
The paper
Nagata, J., & Lijphart, A. (1979). Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. International Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/40201796

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.