The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personalization of national election campaigns
Abstract
The empirical evidence concerning the ‘personalization of politics' thesis is, at best, mixed. The analysis of a new data-set on the media coverage of national elections in six Western European countries serves to reinforce this overall rather sceptical conclusion. The analysis shows that, in the national elections in the six countries covered (Austria, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom [UK]), there is no general trend to increasing personalization or increasing concentration of the media coverage on a limited set of particularly visible personalities. Among the six countries, the exception to this overall assessment is the Netherlands, where we find both a trend towards increasing personalization and increasing concentration of the public attention on a limited set of personalities. Rather than an increasing level of personalization, what we generally observe are large country-specific differences in the overall degree of personalization and of the concentration of attention on the top candidates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics
Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790867 · Cited by 5,508
West European Politics in the Age of Globalization
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2008) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790720 · Cited by 2,319
Self-citationKriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2006) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00644.x · Cited by 1,775
Self-citationFraming Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power
Entman, R. M. (2007) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x · Cited by 1,767
"Mediatization" of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy?
MAZZOLENI, G., & SCHULZ, W. (1999) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/105846099198613 · Cited by 1,483
Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy
Sparrow, B. H. (2004) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592704350589 · Cited by 1,352
Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy
Entman, R. M. (2003) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226210735.001.0001 · Cited by 1,252
Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies
Wattenberg, M. P. (2002) · doi:10.1093/0199253099.001.0001 · Cited by 1,011
Mancini, P., & Swanson, D. C. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 576
Cited by
(2014) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137275844 · Cited by 300
Absent yet popular? Explaining news visibility of Members of the European Parliament
Gattermann, K., & Vasilopoulou, S. (2015) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12071 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Kriesi, H.
- Venue
- Party Politics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-03-23
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 825-844
- ISSN
- 1354-0688 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3683
- OpenAlex
- W2170928597
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 73.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Personalization of national election campaigns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1354068810389643
- The paper
- Kriesi, H. (2012). Personalization of national election campaigns. Party Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810389643
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.