#NoSnowflakes: The toleration of harassment and an emergent gender-related digital divide, in a UK student online culture
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, some political commentators and mainstream media outlets in the United Kingdom have pejoratively labelled young people, especially university students, a ‘snowflake generation’ – a term used to mock their perceived intolerance and over-sensitivity (Fox, 2016; Gullis, 2017; Slater, 2016; Talbot, 2020). This article challenges this discourse by drawing on findings from a large-scale study ( N = 810) conducted on a university campus in England that critically examined student’s perceptions of and attitudes to different forms of online harassment, including abusive, offensive and harassing communications, using survey and interview data. Key findings indicate that online harassment is so pervasive in digitised spaces that it is often viewed as the ‘norm’ by the student population who appear willing to tolerate it, rather than take actions to address it, which challenges pejorative claims that they are intolerant and easily offended ‘snowflakes’. Respondents who identify as female and transgender are more likely to be targeted by online harassment. We argue that the label ‘snowflake generation’ is diverting attention away from student’s everyday experiences of online harassment and its adverse effects, particularly on women and transgendered people, which has the potential to create a gender-related digital divide (Jane, 2018). The implications of these findings for the higher education sector will be outlined.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nudes of girls form a homosocial currency among boys, garnering regard and kudos from their male peers.
“We can see how nudes of girls form a homosocial currency among boys, garnering regard and kudos from their male peers (Salter, 2016; Haslop & O ' Rourke, 2021; Mandau, 2020).”
From Young people's experiences of image-based sexual harassment and abuse in England and Canada: Toward a feminist framing of technologically facilitated sexual violence (2022) · cites this paper as Haslop & O'Rourke, 2021
Cites
Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2017) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007 · Cited by 1,471 · see citing works
Helsper, E. J., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816634676 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Online incivility or sexual harassment? Conceptualising women's experiences in the digital age
Megarry, J. (2014) · Women's Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2014.07.012 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Privates in the online public: Sex(ting) and reputation on social media
Salter, M. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815604133 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ringrose, J., Milne, B., Mishna, F., Regehr, K., & Slane, A. (2022) · Women's Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102615 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Reporting online abuse to platforms: Factors, interfaces and the potential for care
Cover, R., Beckett, J., Brevini, B., Lumby, C., Simcock, R., & Thompson, J. D. (2026) · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/13548565251324508 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Haslop, C., O’Rourke, F., & Southern, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Haslop, Craig
- Venue
- Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-03-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1418-1438
- ISSN
- 1354-8565 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-7382
- OpenAlex
- W3136157744
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Higher Education Funding Council for England (M100)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Keywords
- online harassment, university students, transgender students, women in higher education, online abuse, higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review