Cited by 26Stalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

#NoSnowflakes: The toleration of harassment and an emergent gender-related digital divide, in a UK student online culture

Open access
Haslop, Craig, O’Rourke, Fiona, Southern, Rosalynd·2021·Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies

Abstract

In recent years, some political commentators and mainstream media outlets in the United Kingdom have pejoratively labelled young people, especially university students, a ‘snowflake generation’ – a term used to mock their perceived intolerance and over-sensitivity (Fox, 2016; Gullis, 2017; Slater, 2016; Talbot, 2020). This article challenges this discourse by drawing on findings from a large-scale study ( N = 810) conducted on a university campus in England that critically examined student’s perceptions of and attitudes to different forms of online harassment, including abusive, offensive and harassing communications, using survey and interview data. Key findings indicate that online harassment is so pervasive in digitised spaces that it is often viewed as the ‘norm’ by the student population who appear willing to tolerate it, rather than take actions to address it, which challenges pejorative claims that they are intolerant and easily offended ‘snowflakes’. Respondents who identify as female and transgender are more likely to be targeted by online harassment. We argue that the label ‘snowflake generation’ is diverting attention away from student’s everyday experiences of online harassment and its adverse effects, particularly on women and transgendered people, which has the potential to create a gender-related digital divide (Jane, 2018). The implications of these findings for the higher education sector will be outlined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1354856521989270

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haslop, C., O’Rourke, F., & Southern, R.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Haslop, Craig
Venue
Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies
Published
2021-03-11
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
1418-1438
ISSN
  • 1354-8565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-7382
OpenAlex
W3136157744
Cited by
26
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Higher Education Funding Council for England (M100)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
online harassment, university students, transgender students, women in higher education, online abuse, higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review