Cited by 295Gender, Feminism, and MediaStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentGender and Feminist Studies

Online incivility or sexual harassment? Conceptualising women's experiences in the digital age

Megarry, Jessica·2014·Women's Studies International Forum

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wsif.2014.07.012

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

9 of the 94 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Megarry, J.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Megarry, Jessica
Venue
Women's Studies International Forum
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
47
Pages
46-55
ISSN
0277-5395 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042757948
Cited by
295
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
27.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Women s Studies International Forum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
online incivility, online sexual harassment, digital public sphere, microblogging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review