Bloggers’ reported tourist experiences: Their utility as a tourism data source and their effect on prospective tourists
Abstract
The present study evaluates the value of tourists’ blogs as a research data source by using them to evaluate the tourist experience and to assess their influence on the decision-making process of prospective tourists. The blogs of 103 tourists visiting South Tyrol, 32 written in English and 71 written in Italian, were analyzed using textual and image content analysis. The text of 246 comments posted to these blogs was analyzed to evaluate the possible influence of bloggers’ narrative on prospective tourists. The results show cultural differences in the way tourists use blogs. Italian blogs appear to have more potential to influence the decision-making process of prospective visitors since their comments often contain recommendations and authors’ declaration of their own future intentions to travel to South Tyrol. They also demonstrate significant potential for revealing market-relevant aspects of tourists’ experience although they do not always convey the ‘experience essence’.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Travel blogs are useful for a more complete understanding of dynamics of travel experience from a tourist's point of view.
“and suggested that travel blogs are useful for a more complete understanding of dynamics of travel experience from a tourist's point of view (Volo, 2010).”
From Religious food as a tourism attraction: the roles of Buddhist temple food in Western tourist experience (2013) · cites this paper as Volo, 2010
Cites
User generated content: the use of blogs for tourism organisations and tourism consumers
Akehurst, G. (2009) · Service Business · doi:10.1007/s11628-008-0054-2 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Wickens, E. (2002) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/s0160-7383(01)00088-3 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Believe it or not: Credibility of blogs in tourism
Mack, R. W., Blose, J. E., & Pan, B. (2008) · Journal of Vacation Marketing · doi:10.1177/1356766707087521 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Son, A., & Xu, H. (2013) · Journal of Heritage Tourism · doi:10.1080/1743873x.2013.767815 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Past, present, and future scene of influencer marketing in hospitality and tourism management
Polat, E., Çelik, F., Ibrahim, B., & Gursoy, D. (2024) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2024.2317741 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Volo, S.
- Affiliations
- Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Volo, Serena
- ORCID
- Volo, Serena
- Venue
- Journal of Vacation Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 297-311
- ISSN
- 1356-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-1870
- OpenAlex
- W2132111262
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 32.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal Of Vacation Marketing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Travel Writing and Literature
- Keywords
- tourist experience, travel decision-making, online travel information, South Tyrol, tourism promotion, user-generated content
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review