Cited by 422Digital Marketing and Social MediaDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchWeb and Library Services

User generated content: the use of blogs for tourism organisations and tourism consumers

Open access
Akehurst, Gary·2009·Service Business

Abstract

As the World Wide Web has developed considerable bargaining power has been transferred from suppliers to consumers; there is a real need to improve market intelligence and market research for private and public tourism organisations and facilitate timely consumer decision making. This article explores the development of user generated content and specifically the use of web logs or blogs. Tourism organisations cannot afford to ignore the development of user generated content, peer-to-peer web applications and virtual communities. A recent survey found that consumers trusted more websites with reviews than professional guides and travel agencies and far from being an irrelevance, blogs are often perceived to be more credible and trustworthy than traditional marketing communications. But there is a problem: given the sheer number of possibly relevant travel blogs there is a need to locate, extract and interpret blog content and this has proven so far to be time consuming, exhausting and costly, thus negating the relative value of the information obtained. A way forward may be the use of artificial intelligence and “opinion mining” or a blog visualisation system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11628-008-0054-2

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The overall credibility of blogs and online social media compared to traditional WOM is relatively high.

    “Whilst personal advice often ranks as the most influential source of pre-trip decision making, the overall credibility of blogs and online social media compared to that of traditional WOM is relatively high (Akehurst, 2009).”

    From Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data (2019) · cites this paper as Akehurst, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akehurst, G.
Affiliations
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Akehurst, Gary
Venue
Service Business
Published
2008-12-11
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
51-61
ISSN
  • 1862-8508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1862-8516
OpenAlex
W2069664012
Cited by
422
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 19
FWCI
27.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Service Business (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web and Library Services
Keywords
user-generated content, blogs, tourism organizations, tourism consumers, online reviews, consumer trust, market intelligence, online communities, sentiment analysis, artificial intelligence, purchase decision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review