Cited by 29Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMobile Learning in EducationEpilepsy research and treatment

A Randomised Controlled Trial of an Sms-Based Mobile Epilepsy Education System

Lua, Pei Lin, Neni, Widiasmoro Selamat·2013·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

We evaluated an epilepsy education programme based on text messaging (SMS). Epilepsy outpatients from three hospitals in Malaysia were randomised into two groups: intervention and control. Patients in the control group were supplied with printed epilepsy educational material while those in the intervention group also received text messages from the Mobile Epilepsy Educational System (MEES). A total of 136 patients completed the study (mean age 31 years; 91% Malay; 51% with an illness duration of more than 5 years). A between-group analysis showed that the awareness, knowledge and attitudes (AKA) about epilepsy did not significantly differ between the groups at baseline ( P > 0.05). The intervention patients reported better AKA levels during follow-up compared to the control patients ( P < 0.05). A within-group analysis showed that in intervention patients, there were significant improvements in all AKA domains with larger effect sizes ( P < 0.01) while control patients also exhibited significant improvement in most domains except for Awareness but with smaller effect sizes. After controlling for possible confounding variables (age, gender, educational qualification, monthly income and baseline mean for each domain), the intervention group still reported significantly higher AKA than the control group particularly in Awareness ( P < 0.001) and Total AKA ( P = 0.003). There was also significantly better medication adherence and clinic attendance in the intervention group ( P < 0.05). The results suggest that the addition of the MEES to conventional epilepsy education is effective in improving AKA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1357633x12473920

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lua, P. L., & Neni, W. S.
Affiliations
  • Sultan Zainal Abidin University (MY)
  • Centre for Clinical and Quality of Life Studies, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2013-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
23-28
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2319995346
Cited by
29
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
Keywords
epilepsy, patient education, text messaging, mobile health, medication adherence, clinic attendance, printed educational materials
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Awareness, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Malaysia, Male, Patient Education as Topic, Program Evaluation, Health Behavior, Telemedicine, Medication Adherence, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review