Cited by 70Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health services

Systematic review of research into frequent callers to crisis helplines

Open access
Middleton, Aves, Gunn, Jane, Bassilios, Bridget, Pirkis, Jane·2014·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of research into callers making multiple calls to crisis helplines. Two databases were searched, identifying 561 articles from 1960 until 2012, of which 63 were relevant. Twenty-one articles from 19 separate studies presented empirical data about callers making multiple calls to crisis helplines. Of the 19 studies, three were intervention studies, five were surveys of callers and 11 were call record audits. Most studies were conducted in the USA and defined frequent callers as people making two or more calls. Frequent callers were more likely to be male and unmarried compared to other callers. There were no reported differences between frequent callers and other callers with regard to age, mental health conditions or suicidality. Three studies tested interventions designed to better manage frequent callers. These studies, even though small, reported reductions in the number of calls made by frequent callers. Suggested techniques for responding to frequent callers included: limiting the number and duration of calls allowed, assigning a specific counsellor, implementing face to face contact, the service initiating contact with the caller instead of waiting for callers to contact the service, providing short term anxiety and depression treatment programmes by telephone, and creating a specific management plan for each frequent caller. Future work requires robust study design methods using larger sample sizes and validated measurements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1357633x14524156

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A modest share of callers account for a substantial share of all calls.

    “A modest share of callers account for a substantial share of all calls (Middleton et al., 2014).”

    From Diverting 911 calls: Lessons from early adopting urban jurisdictions (2024) · cites this paper as Middleton et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Middleton, A., Gunn, J., Bassilios, B., & Pirkis, J.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Middleton, Aves
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2014-02-11
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
89-98
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2329018733
Cited by
70
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Rotary Health
  • Servier
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
crisis helplines, suicide prevention, mental health services, telephone counseling, intervention research
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Crisis Intervention, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Male, Research, Telephone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review