Cited by 49Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Use by Older AdultsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Multi-site videoconferencing for home-based education of older people with chronic conditions: the Telehealth Literacy Project

Open access
Banbury, Annie, Parkinson, Lynne, Nancarrow, Susan, Dart, Jared, Gray, Len, Buckley, Jennene·2014·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

We examined the acceptability of multi-site videoconferencing as a method of providing group education to older people in their homes. There were 9 groups comprising 52 participants (mean age 73 years) with an average of four chronic conditions. Tablet computers or PCs were installed in participant's homes and connected to the Internet by the National Broadband Network (high-speed broad band network) or by the 4G wireless network. A health literacy and self-management programme was delivered by videoconference for 5 weeks. Participants were able to view and interact with all group members and the facilitator on their devices. During the study, 44 group videoconferences were conducted. Evaluation included 16 semi-structured interviews, 3 focus groups and a journal detailing project implementation. The participants reported enjoying home-based group education by videoconference and found the technology easy to use. Using home-based groups via videoconference was acceptable for providing group education, and considered particularly valuable for people living alone and/or with limited mobility. Audio difficulties were the most commonly reported problem. Participants connected with 4G experienced more problems (audio and visual) than participants on the National Broadband Network and those living in multi-dwelling residences reported more problems than those living in single-dwelling residences. Older people with little computer experience can be supported to use telehealth equipment. Telehealth has the potential to improve access to education about chronic disease self-management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1357633x14552369

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banbury, A., Parkinson, L., Nancarrow, S., Dart, J., Gray, L., & Buckley, J.
Affiliations
  • Central Queensland University (AU)
  • Southern Cross University (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Queensland Police Service (AU)
Corresponding author
Banbury, Annie
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2014-10
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
353-359
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2092105646
Cited by
49
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion)
  • Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • Central Queensland University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
older adults, chronic disease, chronic disease self-management, health literacy, telemedicine, acceptability, National Broadband Network, limited mobility, technology acceptance
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Self-Help Groups, Focus Groups, Telemedicine, Disease Management, Internet, Qualitative Research, Videoconferencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review