Multi-site videoconferencing for home-based education of older people with chronic conditions: the Telehealth Literacy Project
Open accessAbstract
We examined the acceptability of multi-site videoconferencing as a method of providing group education to older people in their homes. There were 9 groups comprising 52 participants (mean age 73 years) with an average of four chronic conditions. Tablet computers or PCs were installed in participant's homes and connected to the Internet by the National Broadband Network (high-speed broad band network) or by the 4G wireless network. A health literacy and self-management programme was delivered by videoconference for 5 weeks. Participants were able to view and interact with all group members and the facilitator on their devices. During the study, 44 group videoconferences were conducted. Evaluation included 16 semi-structured interviews, 3 focus groups and a journal detailing project implementation. The participants reported enjoying home-based group education by videoconference and found the technology easy to use. Using home-based groups via videoconference was acceptable for providing group education, and considered particularly valuable for people living alone and/or with limited mobility. Audio difficulties were the most commonly reported problem. Participants connected with 4G experienced more problems (audio and visual) than participants on the National Broadband Network and those living in multi-dwelling residences reported more problems than those living in single-dwelling residences. Older people with little computer experience can be supported to use telehealth equipment. Telehealth has the potential to improve access to education about chronic disease self-management.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All studies included results on feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness, and some reported issues connected with implementation.
“All studies included results on feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness, and some reported issues connected with implementation [33,36-38,40-44,47].”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [33]
Communication can be adapted for the Web environment.
“Communication can be adapted for the Web environment”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [33]
Overall, inexperience with videoconferencing or computer use did not appear to be a major problem; the majority of studies reported that over time participants found the technology easy to use and enjoyable.
“Overall, inexperience did not appear to be a major problem as the majority of studies reported that, over time, participants found the technology easy to use [32-35,40-42,46] and found videoconferencing enjoyable [42,44-46].”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [33]
Three studies reported that technical difficulties declined during the course of the intervention.
“However, 3 studies reported that technical difficulties declined during the course of the intervention [33,38,46].”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [33]
Eight of the 15 studies reported few technical difficulties, whereas 7 reported a number of problems, 2 of which required substantial work hours to overcome.
“Various levels of technical problems were encountered; 8 of the 15 studies reported few difficulties [31,32,34-36,38,44-46], whereas 7 reported a number of problems [33,37,39,42,43,45,47], 2 of which required substantial work hours to overcome [39,47].”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [33]
Over time, the vast majority of participants became familiar with the technology and adapted their communication accordingly.
“Over time, the vast majority of participants became familiar with the technology and adapted their communication accordingly [33,36,42,46].”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [33]
The most common technical problem reported was audio difficulties, including delays, dropouts, and background noise, followed by problems in downloading software.
“The most common problem reported was audio difficulties, which included delays, dropouts, and background noise [33,37,38,44,45], followed by problems in downloading software [38,42,43].”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [33]
Some participants reported feeling more relaxed and open by being at home and valued the convenience.
“some participants reported feeling more relaxed and open by being at home and valued the convenience [33,34,36,42-46].”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [33]
Higher levels of cohesiveness were demonstrated in groups with more stable memberships compared with groups whose membership altered.
“Higher levels of cohesiveness were demonstrated in groups with more stable memberships compared with groups whose membership altered because of changes in participants’ availability [33].”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [33]
Videoconferencing groups provided emotional and social support.
“and provided emotional and social support [32-35]”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [33]
Qualitative studies reported discussion themes that illustrated participants' ability to discuss sensitive and personal issues and to give and receive empathetic support.
“Qualitative studies reported discussion themes that illustrated participants’ ability to discuss sensitive and personal issues and to give and receive empathetic support [33,36,42,44,45].”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [33]
Cites
Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008) · SAGE · doi:10.4135/9781452230153 · Cited by 12,136 · see citing works
Sanders, C., Rogers, A., Bowen, R., Bower, P., Hirani, S., Cartwright, M., Fitzpatrick, R., Knapp, M., Barlow, J., Hendy, J., et al. (2012) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-220 · Cited by 450 · see citing works
Russell, T. G., Buttrum, P., Wootton, R., & Jull, G. A. (2011) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/jbjs.i.01375 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Marziali, E., & Donahue, P. (2006) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/46.3.398 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Osborne, R. H., Batterham, R., & Livingston, J. (2011) · Nursing Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.cnur.2011.05.010 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review
Banbury, A., Nancarrow, S., Dart, J., Gray, L., & Parkinson, L. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8090 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Self-citationEvidence for telehealth group-based treatment: a systematic review
Gentry, M. T., Lapid, M. I., Clark, M. M., & Rummans, T. A. (2019) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x18775855 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Banbury, A., Parkinson, L., Nancarrow, S., Dart, J., Gray, L. C., & Buckley, J. (2016) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x16674359 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Banbury, A., Parkinson, L., Nancarrow, S., Dart, J., Gray, L., & Buckley, J.
- Affiliations
- Central Queensland University (AU)
- Southern Cross University (AU)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Queensland Police Service (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Banbury, Annie
- Venue
- Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 353-359
- ISSN
- 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-1109
- OpenAlex
- W2092105646
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion)
- Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- Central Queensland University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Keywords
- older adults, chronic disease, chronic disease self-management, health literacy, telemedicine, acceptability, National Broadband Network, limited mobility, technology acceptance
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Self-Help Groups, Focus Groups, Telemedicine, Disease Management, Internet, Qualitative Research, Videoconferencing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review