Cited by 188Nursing care and researchTechnology Use by Older AdultsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Caring for Others: Internet Video-Conferencing Group Intervention for Family Caregivers of Older Adults With Neurodegenerative Disease

Marziali, Elsa, Donahue, Peter·2006·The Gerontologist

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this pilot feasibility study was to evaluate the effects of an innovative, Internet-based psychosocial intervention for family caregivers of older adults with neurodegenerative disease. DESIGN AND METHODS: After receiving signed informed consent from each participant, we randomly assigned 66 caregivers to an Internet-based intervention or to a no-intervention control group. The intervention group received computers and training in order to access a password-protected Web site with links to information, e-mail, and threaded discussion. Unique to the Web site was a video-conferencing link that supported caregivers' participation in a 10-session, manual-guided psychosocial support group, followed by 12 additional online sessions facilitated by a group member. Participants completed health-status and stress-response measures at baseline and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Content analysis of archived video sessions showed (a) reliable adherence to the manual-guided support-group intervention and (b) online group discussion themes similar to those in face-to-face caregiver support groups. Analyses of stress-response outcome data showed significant between-group differences, with the intervention group experiencing a decline in stress compared with an escalation in stress for the control group. IMPLICATIONS: Despite the limitations of this pilot study in terms of limited sample size and 54% dropout of control participants at 6-month follow-up, the results provide preliminary supportive evidence for a technology-based psychosocial intervention for family caregivers of individuals with neurodegenerative disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/46.3.398

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marziali, E., & Donahue, P.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Marziali, Elsa
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2006-06
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
398-403
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2171211918
Cited by
185
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
16.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
family caregivers, neurodegenerative diseases, older adults, videoconferencing, online support groups, psychosocial interventions, caregiver stress, technology-based interventions, caregiver support
MeSH terms
Aged, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Telecommunications, Caregivers, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review