Cited by 65Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and EducationTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Participant experiences in a smartphone-based health coaching intervention for type 2 diabetes: A qualitative inquiry

Pludwinski, Sarah, Ahmad, Farah, Wayne, Noah, Ritvo, Paul·2016·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

Introduction: We investigated the experience of individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who participated in an intervention in which the key elements were the provision of a smartphone and self-monitoring software. The interviews focused on use of a smartphone and the effects on motivation for health behavior change. Methods: This was a qualitative evaluation of participants in a larger T2DM self-management randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted at the Black Creek Community Health Centre (BCCHC) in Toronto, Canada (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02036892). The study is based on semi-structured interviews ( n = 11) that were audio taped and analyzed with a thematic analytic approach. The RCT compared the effectiveness of six months of smartphone-based self-monitoring and health coaching with a control group who received health coaching without internet or smartphone-based assistance. Results: Qualitative data analyses resulted in derivation of four major themes that describe participant experience: (a) ‘smartphone and software’, describes smartphone use in relation to health behavior change; (b) ‘health coach’ describes how client/health coach relationships were assisted by smartphone use; (c) ‘overall experience’ describes perceptions of the overall intervention; and (d) ‘frustrations in managing chronic conditions’ describes difficulties with the complexities of T2DM management from a patient perspective. Discussion: Findings suggest that interventions with T2DM assisted by smartphone software and health coaches actively engage individuals in improved hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) control.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1357633x15595178

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pludwinski, S., Ahmad, F., Wayne, N., & Ritvo, P.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Ritvo, Paul
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2015-07-21
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
172-178
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2283882437
Cited by
65
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
13.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • YorkSpace (York University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Health Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, health behavior change, patient experience, chronic disease self-management, HbA1c control, diabetes self-management
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Mentoring, Adult, Aged, Canada, Counseling, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Health Promotion, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Self Care, Social Support, Health Behavior, Disease Management, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review