Cited by 33Cancer survivorship and careTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDigital Mental Health Interventions

The effectiveness of telehealth programs on the mental health of women with breast cancer: A systematic review

Koç, Zeynep, Kaplan, Ece, Tanrıverdi, Derya·2024·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this systematic review is to determine the evidence-based information and results about the effectiveness of telehealth programs on the mental health of women with breast cancer. Methods: The research process was carried out using PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials with available abstract and full text, which were published in English with the keywords "telehealth," "telemedicine," "web-based therapy," "telepsychiatry," "online therapy" and "breast cancer" in Pub Med, PsycINFO, Medline, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Sciences and Cochrane databases between 2015-2019 were searced. As a result of the evaluations, the research was completed with 16 studies meeting the research criteria. Results: There was strong evidence for reduce the fear of relapse of cancer, depressive symptoms and severity of depression, distress, intrusive thoughts, anxiety, sleep disorder, insomnia, improve quality of life and for improve cognitive functions, improve psychological strength and sleep quality of telehealth programs in women with breast cancer. Furthermore, evidence was found for increase psychological health, functionality, optimism and control over the future, positive mood and life appreciation, and drug compliance of these programs. Conclusion: This review found evidence for the effectiveness of telehealth programs on the mental problems of women with breast cancer. In this sense, it is recommended to expand the use of telehealth programs, which can…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1357633x211069663

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koç, Z., Kaplan, E., & Tanrıverdi, D.
Affiliations
Gaziantep University (TR)
Corresponding author
Koç, Zeynep
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2022-02-02
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
405-419
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W4210346633
Cited by
33
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
telemedicine, breast cancer, mental health, depression, anxiety, quality of life, sleep quality, insomnia, fear of cancer recurrence, psychological distress, online therapy, telepsychiatry, medication adherence, women
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Breast Neoplasms, Depression, Female, Humans, Mental Health, Quality of Life, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review