The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring Heart and Soul: Effects of Religiosity/Spirituality and Gender on Blood Pressure and Cortisol Stress Responses
Abstract
The current study investigated gender effects on the influence of self-reported religiosity and spirituality on cardiovascular and cortisol responses to a laboratory stressor among young adults. Participants with higher composite religiosity/spirituality scores, religiosity, levels of forgiveness and frequency of prayer showed lower cortisol responses. Greater composite religiosity/spirituality, religiosity, frequency of prayer and attendance at services were associated with lower blood pressure in males and elevated blood pressure in females. Findings suggest that spiritual and/or religious individuals may experience a protective effect against the neuroendocrine consequences of stress, though cardiovascular benefits may vary by gender. This work represents an important step in the convergence of multiple realms of research by linking physiological measures with indicators of individual belief systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Ten of the 12 studies had quality ratings of 7 or higher; of those, seven (70%) reported significant inverse associations with infection/viral load [440, 441, 449–454].”
From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [450]
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Stress, adaptation, and disease. Allostasis and allostatic load
McEWEN, B. S. (1998) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x · Cited by 5,092
Attentional bias in emotional disorders
MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.95.1.15 · Cited by 3,152
Attentional bias in emotional disorders.
MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. R. (1986) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.95.1.15 · Cited by 2,553
Benson, H., Beary, J. F., & Carol, M. P. (1974) · Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00332747.1974.11023785 · Cited by 2,467
The psychology of religion and coping : theory, research, practice
Pargament, K. (1998) · Review of Religious Research · doi:10.2307/3512468 · Cited by 1,680
The Psychology of Religion and Coping
Mcfadden, S., & Pargament, K. (1997) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1387534 · Cited by 1,597
The Religion-Health Connection: Evidence, Theory, and Future Directions
Ellison, C. G., & Levin, J. S. (1998) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/109019819802500603 · Cited by 1,496
Religious involvement and mortality: A meta-analytic review.
McCullough, M. E., Hoyt, W. T., Larson, D. B., Koenig, H. G., & Thoresen, C. E. (2000) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.3.211 · Cited by 1,115
Religion and spirituality: Linkages to physical health.
Powell, L. H., Shahabi, L., & Thoresen, C. E. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.1.36 · Cited by 1,093
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Fetzer Institute, 1999, Multidimensional measurement of religiousness, spirituality for use in health research
- McBride, J. L., 1998, Family Medicine, 30, 122
- Schuler, P. A., 1994, Nursing Practice Forum, 5, 106
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications
Koenig, H. G. (2012) · ISRN Psychiatry · doi:10.5402/2012/278730 · Cited by 2,423
Chida, Y., & Hamer, M. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0013342 · Cited by 667
Religiosity/Spirituality and Mortality
Chida, Y., Steptoe, A., & Powell, L. H. (2009) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000190791 · Cited by 409
Gender and Forgiveness: A Meta–Analytic Review and Research Agenda
Miller, A. J., Worthington, E. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2008) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2008.27.8.843 · Cited by 378
Spirituality and Religiosity and Its Role in Health and Diseases
Mishra, S. K., Togneri, E., Tripathi, B., & Trikamji, B. (2015) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-015-0100-z · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Tartaro, J., Luecken, L. J., & Gunn, H. E.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Health Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 753-766
- ISSN
- 1359-1053 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7277
- OpenAlex
- W2142284366
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 6.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
- Keywords
- religiosity, spirituality, gender differences, blood pressure, cortisol, stress response, forgiveness, prayer, religious service attendance, cardiovascular health, neuroendocrine stress response, young adults
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Blood Pressure, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Reaction Time, Religion and Medicine, Religion and Psychology, Saliva, Self Disclosure, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Students, Task Performance and Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
