Cited by 409Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipReligion and Society Interactions

Religiosity/Spirituality and Mortality

Chida, Yoichi, Steptoe, Andrew, Powell, Lynda H.·2009·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Abstract

Background: The relationship between religiosity/spirituality and physical health has been the subject of growing interest in epidemiological research. We systematically reviewed prospective observational cohort studies of the association between this potentially protective psychological factor and mortality using meta-analytic methods. Methods: We searched general bibliographic databases: Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science and PubMed (up to 20 March, 2008). Two reviewers independently extracted data on study characteristics, quality, and estimates of associations. Random effects meta-analyses, subgrouping, and sensitivity analysis were performed. Results: There were 69 studies (28 articles) and 22 studies (11 articles) investigating the association between religiosity/spirituality and mortality in initially healthy populations and diseased populations, respectively. The results of the meta-analyses showed that religiosity/spirituality was associated with reduced mortality in healthy population studies (combined hazard ratio = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.76–0.87, p <0.001), but not in diseased population studies (combined hazard ratio = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.94–1.01, p = 0.19). Notably, the protective effect of religiosity/spirituality in the initially healthy population studies was independent of behavioral factors (smoking, drinking, exercising, and socioeconomic status), negative affect, and social support. We divided studies according to the aspects of religiosity/spirituality measure examined, and found that organizational activity (e.g. church attendance) was associated with greater survival in healthy population studies. Multi-dimensional aspects were related to survival in both the healthy and diseased populations. Religiosity/spirituality was negatively associated with cardiovascular mortality in healthy population studies. Conclusions: The current review suggests that religiosity/spirituality has a favorable effect on survival, although the presence of publication biases indicates that results should be interpreted with caution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000190791

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RS are linked to improved health and health-relevant outcomes among individuals with cardiovascular disease, cancer, and substance abuse.

    “are linked to a number of improved health and health-relevant outcomes among individuals with a variety of conditions such as cardiovascular disease (Chida et al., 2009), cancer (Laubmeier et al., 2004), and substance abuse (Geppert et al., 2007).”
  • Evidence from rigorously designed population studies and a seminal meta-analysis suggested an independent association between organizational religiosity (religious service attendance) and CVD mortality.

    “The evidence from rigorously designed population studies and from a seminal meta-analysis suggested the existence of an independent association between organizational religiosity (i.e., religious service attendance) and CVD mortality (Chida et al., 2009; Hummer et al., 1999; Oman et al., 2002).”
  • Overall, positive associations between RS and CVD were found in studies conducted among younger healthy individuals.

    “Overall, positive associations between RS and CVD were found in studies conducted among younger healthy individuals (Chida et al., 2009; Friedlander et al., 1986; Goldbourt et al., 1993; Hummer et al., 1999; Oman et al., 2002).”
  • Current evidence linking RS and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity remains inconclusive.

    “Taken together, the above findings indicate that despite the earlier meta-analytical finding of an independent association between RS and CVD outcomes (Chida et al., 2009), the current evidence linking RS and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity remains inconclusive”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 88 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chida, Y., Steptoe, A., & Powell, L. H.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009
Volume
78
Issue
2
Pages
81-90
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W2019612427
Cited by
409
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 25
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
religiosity, spirituality, mortality, survival, church attendance, cardiovascular mortality, healthy population, publication bias
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Psychophysiology, Religion, Meditation, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review