Cited by 1,093Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Religion and spirituality: Linkages to physical health.

Powell, Lynda H., Shahabi, Leila, Thoresen, Carl E.·2003·American Psychologist

Abstract

Evidence is presented that bears on 9 hypotheses about the link between religion or spirituality and mortality, morbidity, disability, or recovery from illness. In healthy participants, there is a strong, consistent, prospective, and often graded reduction in risk of mortality in church/service attenders. This reduction is approximately 25% after adjustment for confounders. Religion or spirituality protects against cardiovascular disease, largely mediated by the healthy lifestyle it encourages. Evidence fails to support a link between depth of religiousness and physical health. In patients, there are consistent failures to support the hypotheses that religion or spirituality slows the progression of cancer or improves recovery from acute illness but some evidence that religion or spirituality impedes recovery from acute illness. The authors conclude that church/service attendance protects healthy people against death. More methodologically sound studies are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.58.1.36

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RS have shown possible influences on many important outcomes, including lower mortality.

    “RS have shown possible influences on many important outcomes, including lower mortality (Powell et al., 2003).”
  • In systematic reviews of RS and cancer mortality or progression, there are consistent failures to support the hypotheses that RS slows cancer progression, and inadequate evidence to support the hypothesis that RS protects against cancer mortality.

    “In systematic reviews of RS and cancer mortality or progression, there are consistent failures to support the hypotheses that RS slows cancer progression, and inadequate evidence to support the hypothesis that RS protects against cancer mortality (Powell et al., 2003).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powell, L. H., Shahabi, L., & Thoresen, C. E.
Affiliations
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
2003-01
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
36-52
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2081669352
Cited by
1,093
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 90
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
religion, spirituality, physical health, mortality, church attendance, cardiovascular disease, healthy lifestyle, religiosity, tumor progression, morbidity, disability
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Death, Health Status, Humans, Morbidity, Mortality, Neoplasms, Religion and Medicine, Risk Factors, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Disease Progression, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review