The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interventions to Increase Self-efficacy in the Context of Addiction Behaviours: A Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
This article describes the effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing self-efficacy and consequently, changing addiction behaviours. Electronic databases were searched and bibliographies of retrieved references scanned. Ten studies targeting tobacco smoking, alcohol and illicit drug use met the inclusion criteria. The interventions ranged from computer-generated tailored letters to intensive group-based interventions. Seven of the 10 studies reported positive effects of interventions upon self-efficacy. The two that assessed behaviour change reported a significant effect but as neither performed mediation analyses, behaviour change could not reliably be attributed to self-efficacy change. In conclusion, self-efficacy can be increased using a range of methods. There is, however, little evidence to determine whether such increases change behaviour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
The Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review of its Applications to Health-Related Behaviors
Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.87 · Cited by 3,185
Moher, D., Pham, B., Lawson, M., & Klassen, T. (2003) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta7410 · Cited by 500
Balk, E. M. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.22.2973 · Cited by 478
Publication and related biases.
Song, Eastwood, Gilbody, Duley, & Sutton (2000) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta4100 · Cited by 427
The English smoking treatment services: one‐year outcomes
Ferguson, J., Bauld, L., Chesterman, J., & Judge, K. (2005) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01028.x · Cited by 347
Cited by
Ashford, S., Edmunds, J., & French, D. P. (2010) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910709x461752 · Cited by 673
The confounded self-efficacy construct: conceptual analysis and recommendations for future research
Williams, D. M., & Rhodes, R. E. (2016) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2014.941998 · Cited by 403
The role of self-efficacy in the treatment of substance use disorders
Kadden, R. M., & Litt, M. D. (2011) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.07.032 · Cited by 384
Outcome Expectancy and Self-Efficacy: Theoretical Implications of an Unresolved Contradiction
Williams, D. M. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868310368802 · Cited by 293
Warren-Findlow, J., Seymour, R. B., & Brunner Huber, L. R. (2012) · Journal of Community Health · doi:10.1007/s10900-011-9410-6 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Hyde, J., Hankins, M., Deale, A., & Marteau, T. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Health Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 607-623
- ISSN
- 1359-1053 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7277
- OpenAlex
- W2031417870
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interventions to Increase Self-efficacy in the Context of Addiction Behaviours: A Systematic Literature Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1359105308090933
- The paper
- Hyde, J., Hankins, M., Deale, A., & Marteau, T. M. (2008). Interventions to Increase Self-efficacy in the Context of Addiction Behaviours: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105308090933
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
