The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of positive reinforcement on teamwork climate, resiliency, and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic: The TEAM-ICU (Transforming Employee Attitudes via Messaging strengthens Interconnection, Communication, and Unity) pilot study
Open accessAbstract
Burnout is an internationally recognized occupational phenomenon that negatively impacts the healthcare workforce and its recipients. The aim of this pilot study was to test whether positive reinforcement and integrating a language of support among co-workers can enhance resiliency, facilitate psychological wellness, and encourage hope. This embedded mixed methods prospective, behavioral, interventional study evaluated the effects of positive feedback on wellness among intensive care unit clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic in a single center, quaternary care medical center. The deliberate positive feedback paradigm has the potential to augment resiliency and improve attitudes toward a teamwork climate. The routine use of deliberate positivity may represent a scalable, low-cost initiative to enhance wellness in a healthcare organization.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“interventions that fostered collegiality or respect through daily team huddles13 or formal recognition programs were unlikely to be effective.14-17”
From What do we really know about addressing burnout among healthcare workers? Maybe less than we think (2026) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
Donabedian, A. (1988) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.260.12.1743 · Cited by 5,895
Des Jarlais, D. C., Lyles, C., Crepaz, N., & the TREND Group (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.3.361 · Cited by 2,817
Long-term psychiatric morbidities among SARS survivors
Mak, I. W. C., Chu, C. M., Pan, P. C., Yiu, M. G. C., & Chan, V. L. (2009) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.001 · Cited by 1,018
Li, Y., Scherer, N., Felix, L., & Kuper, H. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246454 · Cited by 536
Blake, H., Yildirim, M., Wood, B., Knowles, S., Mancini, H., Coyne, E., & Cooper, J. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17249401 · Cited by 74 · cited 2×
“provide the crucial peer-to-peer support thought to be critical for moving the needle on healthcare provider wellness during the COVID-19 pandemic (Blake et al., 2020; Salas-Vallina et al., 2020).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Bees J, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery, 2, 1
- 10.1002/emp2.12516 · DOI
- 10.1037/emo0000321 · DOI
- Creswell JW, 2007, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 68
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646435 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11606-014-3112-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.2018.14284 · DOI
- 10.1186/s40359-020-00497-z · DOI
- 10.1007/s11606-014-3144-y · DOI
- 10.1177/1359105316677295 · DOI
- 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23667 · DOI
- 10.3402/meo.v20.27840 · DOI
- 10.12927/cjnl.2018.25678 · DOI
- Li Y, 2021, PLoS One, 16
- Maunder R, 2003, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 168, 1245
- 10.1177/0020764017746197 · DOI
- 10.1164/rccm.201604-0708ST · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2196/22408 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.03.025 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.026 · DOI · Paper page
- Pollock A, 2020, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11
- 10.1038/s41372-021-01100-y · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.2018.12777 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00224545.2018.1469461 · DOI
- 10.2298/VSP210517070S · DOI
- 10.1002/hpm.3035 · DOI
- Sangal RB, 2020, BMJ Leader, 5
- 10.1186/1472-6963-6-44 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMp2024834 · DOI
- 10.5811/westjem.2020.7.48684 · DOI
- 10.1080/10705500802222972 · DOI · Paper page
- The Physician’s Foundation (2021) 2021 Survey of America's Physicians: COVID-19 Impact Edition: A Year Later. Available at: https://physiciansfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/2021-Survey-Of-Americas-Physicians-Covid-19-Impact-Edition-A-Year-Later.pdf (accessed 1 October 2021).
- 10.1136/bmj.316.7138.1154 · DOI
- 10.1080/13669877.2020.1842989 · DOI
- West CP, 2020, The Journal of the American Medical Association, 3
- 10.1111/pcn.13098 · DOI
- 10.1111/jonm.12589 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What do we really know about addressing burnout among healthcare workers? Maybe less than we think
Goetzel, R. Z., Fazen, L. E., Kent, K. B., Roemer, E. C., & Saldanha, I. J. (2026) · Health affairs scholar · doi:10.1093/haschl/qxag041
“14-17 By contrast, programs that fostered more intensive, sustained, and meaningful interpersonal connections horizontally among peers, 18-21 as well as vertically with super-visors, 22 produced more consistent positive effects.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, J., Berdahl, C. T., Ye, X., & Wertheimer, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Green, Jack
- Venue
- Journal of Health Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-06-20
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 267-278
- ISSN
- 1359-1053 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7277
- PMC
- PMC9982400
- OpenAlex
- W4283171625
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Keywords
- positive reinforcement, positive feedback, teamwork climate, resilience, burnout, intensive care unit clinicians, healthcare workforce, COVID-19 pandemic, psychological well-being, hope, workplace communication
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, Burnout, Professional, Communication, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Reinforcement, Psychology, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
