Cited by 536COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Prevalence of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder in health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Li, Yufei, Scherer, Nathaniel, Felix, Lambert, Kuper, Hannah·2021·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed health care workers under psychological stress. Previous reviews show a high prevalence of mental disorders among health care workers, but these need updating and inclusion of studies written in Chinese. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide updated prevalence estimates for depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, benefitting from the inclusion of studies published in Chinese. Methods: Systematic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Global Health, Web of Science, CINAHL, Google Scholar and the Chinese databases SinoMed, WanfangMed, CNKI and CQVIP, for studies conducted between December 2019 and August 2020 on the prevalence of depression, anxiety and PTSD in health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies published in both English and Chinese were included. Results: Data on the prevalence of moderate depression, anxiety and PTSD was pooled across 65 studies involving 97,333 health care workers across 21 countries. The pooled prevalence of depression was 21.7% (95% CI, 18.3%-25.2%), of anxiety 22.1% (95% CI, 18.2%-26.3%), and of PTSD 21.5% (95% CI, 10.5%-34.9%). Prevalence estimates are also provided for a mild classification of each disorder. Pooled prevalence estimates of depression and anxiety were highest in studies conducted in the Middle-East (34.6%; 28.9%). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted across covariates, including sampling method and outcome measure. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis has identified a high prevalence of moderate depression, anxiety and PTSD among health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Appropriate support is urgently needed. The response would benefit from additional research on which interventions are effective at mitigating these risks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0246454

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [40]Gu XW, Wen M, K HH. [ The study on the relationship between the mental health status and social support of nurses in hospitals during the period of COVID-19]. Journal of Gannan Medical University. 2020; 40(4): 325– 9.
  2. [42]Gupta P, Rai P, Dang K. Acute stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorderand major depressive disorder during COVID-19 epidemic in India: online questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey. Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2020; 19(4): 50– 9.
  3. [50]Li Z, Shi HR, Chen JF, Shi YF, Feng LH. [ Investigation and Analysis on the Mental Health Status and Coping Style of First-line Nurses of Shanxi Province During the Outbreak of COVID-19]. Journal of Changzhi Medical College. 2020; 34(2): 87– 91.
  4. [51]Liu S, Han W, Shen C. [The Prevalence and Influencing Factors for Depression Symptom Among Frontline Heathcare Workers from Emergency Department Fighting Against COVID-19: A National Cross-Sectional Survey in China] (Preprint). 2020.
  5. [64]Sun ZX, Yu XF. Anxiety and depression symptoms and related factors of medical staff in closed-door psychiatric ward during COVID-19 outbreak. Sichuan Mental Health. 2020; 33(2): 102– 6.
  6. [67]Tang HH, Lu XY, Cai SX. [ Investigation and analysis on mental health status of frontline nurses in Wuhan during COVID-19 epidemic]. Int Infect Dis. 2020; 9(2): 296– 7.
  7. [70]Wang Q, Dong L, Guo X, Fan Y, Zhang X, Nie Y. [ Investigation on mental health status of nurses who participated in COVID-19 prevention and control in Zhongshan City]. Nursing of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine. 2020; 6(3): 14– 6.
  8. [74]Xie ZY, Zhang P, Xie Q, Chen YQ, Chen ZW. [ Correlation study between mental health and coping style of medical staff during COVID-19 epidemic]. Journal of Hubei Minzu University. 2020; 37(2).
  9. [75]Yao L, Kong W, Deng Z, Dong H, Sun L. [ Psychological problems and interventions of front-line medical staff in COVID-19 isolation ward]. Journal of Xinjiang Medical University. 2020; 43(4): 386– 90.
  10. [76]Ye JR, Xia ZC, Xiao AX, Li SY, Lin JK. [ Investigation on nurses’ anxiety status and influencing factors during the outbreak of COVID-19]. 2020; 33(1): 11– 4.
  11. [77]Yin J, Wu X, Ma W, Xu J, Wei P. [ Psychological investigation and analysis on medical care personnel in designated hospitals of coronavirus disease 2019]. Medicine and Philosophy. 2020; 41(8): 38– 67.
  12. [80]Zhao YP, Zhang XJ, Peng JX, Fang P. Status and Influencing Factors of Depression of Nurses from High-risk Departments during COVID-19 Pandemic Period. Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide. 2020; 22(5): 294– 300.
  13. [81]Zhao YJ, Zhang FY, Gong JZ, Li RR, Wu DM. [ Survey on the difficulties, requirements and psychological status of general practitioners in community-based prevention and control of the COVID-19 epidemic]. Clinical Education of General Practice. 2020; 18(3): 240– 4.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., Scherer, N., Felix, L., & Kuper, H.
Affiliations
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Scherer, Nathaniel
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2021-03-10
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
e0246454
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133985703
Cited by
536
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 127 · 2022: 161 · 2021: 63 · 2012: 1
FWCI
14.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, healthcare workers, COVID-19 pandemic, prevalence, psychological stress, mental health, workplace mental health
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Health Personnel, Humans, Mental Health, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Prevalence, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review