The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance
Abstract
This article reports on three research studies, all of which concern second language task performance. The first focuses on planning, and compares on-line and strategic planning as well as task repetition. The second study examines the role of familiarity on task performance, and compares this with conventional strategic planning. The third study examines the effect on task performance of different types of post-task transcription. The three studies are also examined in relation to one another for the broader generalizations that they permit. These suggest that repetition can be stronger in its effects than on-line or strategic planning, but that planning is more potent in its effects than simply familiarity with the material being spoken about. In addition, what is termed supported on-line planning and post-task transcription are associated with less error in performance. The three studies are discussed in terms of the wider second language performance processes of complexifying, rehearsing and monitoring. These processes are linked to the Levelt model of speaking, and applied to the need to analyse tasks in a manner consistent with pedagogic goals.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mid-clause pausing reflects difficulties in retrieving relevant lemmas and accessing the morpho-syntactic information associated with them.
“In particular, mid-clause pausing reflects difficulties in retrieving relevant lemmas and accessing the morpho-syntactic information associated with them (Götz, 2013;Skehan et al., 2012).”
From TASK REPETITION AND SECOND LANGUAGE SPEECH PROCESSING (2017) · cites this paper as Skehan et al., 2012
Cites
THE EFFECTS OF PLANNING ON FLUENCY, COMPLEXITY, AND ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGE NARRATIVE WRITING
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263104261034 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
1. The value and practice of research synthesis for language learning and teaching
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2006) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.13.04nor · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
TASK REPETITION AND SECOND LANGUAGE SPEECH PROCESSING
Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D. (2017) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263116000085 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Wang, Z. (2014) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.5.02wan · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Self-citationVAN DE GUCHTE, M., BRAAKSMA, M., RIJLAARSDAM, G., & BIMMEL, P. (2015) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12211 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
- Authors
- Skehan, P., Xiaoyue, B., Qian, L., & Wang, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Hang Seng University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, China
- Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Venue
- Language Teaching Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 170-187
- ISSN
- 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0954
- OpenAlex
- W2086040345
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 42.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- task-based language teaching, strategic planning, online planning, task repetition, familiarity, speech errors, rehearsal, monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review