Cited by 121EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance

Skehan, Peter, Xiaoyue, Bei, Qian, Li, Wang, Zhan·2012·Language Teaching Research

Abstract

This article reports on three research studies, all of which concern second language task performance. The first focuses on planning, and compares on-line and strategic planning as well as task repetition. The second study examines the role of familiarity on task performance, and compares this with conventional strategic planning. The third study examines the effect on task performance of different types of post-task transcription. The three studies are also examined in relation to one another for the broader generalizations that they permit. These suggest that repetition can be stronger in its effects than on-line or strategic planning, but that planning is more potent in its effects than simply familiarity with the material being spoken about. In addition, what is termed supported on-line planning and post-task transcription are associated with less error in performance. The three studies are discussed in terms of the wider second language performance processes of complexifying, rehearsing and monitoring. These processes are linked to the Levelt model of speaking, and applied to the need to analyse tasks in a manner consistent with pedagogic goals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362168811428414

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mid-clause pausing reflects difficulties in retrieving relevant lemmas and accessing the morpho-syntactic information associated with them.

    “In particular, mid-clause pausing reflects difficulties in retrieving relevant lemmas and accessing the morpho-syntactic information associated with them (Götz, 2013;Skehan et al., 2012).”

    From TASK REPETITION AND SECOND LANGUAGE SPEECH PROCESSING (2017) · cites this paper as Skehan et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skehan, P., Xiaoyue, B., Qian, L., & Wang, Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Hang Seng University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, China
  • Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
Language Teaching Research
Published
2012-04
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
170-187
ISSN
  • 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0954
OpenAlex
W2086040345
Cited by
121
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
42.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
task-based language teaching, strategic planning, online planning, task repetition, familiarity, speech errors, rehearsal, monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review