Cited by 453EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningWriting and Handwriting Education

THE EFFECTS OF PLANNING ON FLUENCY, COMPLEXITY, AND ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGE NARRATIVE WRITING

Ellis, Rod, Yuan, Fangyuan·2004·Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0272263104261034

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F.
Venue
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
Published
2004-03
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
59-84
ISSN
  • 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1545
OpenAlex
W4252419718
Cited by
453
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
FWCI
12.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Studies in Second Language Acquisition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
Keywords
planning, fluency, complexity, accuracy, second language writing, narrative writing, writing process

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review