Cited by 70EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Measuring group work dynamics and its relation with L2 learners’ task motivation and language production

Poupore, Glen·2016·Language Teaching Research

Abstract

While learners of a second language (L2) are increasingly interacting in small groups as part of a communicative methodological paradigm, very few studies have investigated the social dynamics that occur in such groups. The aim of this study is to introduce a group work dynamic measuring instrument and to investigate the relationship between group work dynamic (GWD), or the social climate existing within a group, and learners’ state-level motivational responses and amount of language produced in interactive tasks. The context for the classroom-based study was a speaking-skills course consisting of a small group of 10 Korean English learners of intermediate to high intermediate proficiency level enrolled in a Korean university TESOL certificate program. The data were based on 15 different tasks that were part of the course and two work groups for each task for a total of 30 groups. Instruments of data collection consisted of audio-video recordings, transcription of all verbal and nonverbal language produced in the tasks, the GWD measurement instrument, and post-task motivation questionnaires. Results from correlational analysis showed a significant relationship between GWD and task motivation and between GWD and language production. Nonverbal-related behaviors, furthermore, were found to be particularly influential in shaping GWD and were significantly associated with learners’ task motivation, especially in the form of greater task enjoyment and sense of success. The study’s findings therefore add support to socio-contextual perspectives in L2 motivation and applied linguistics that emphasize the critical role of social and group factors on motivation and language development and imply a need for educators to focus on creating positive group dynamics in their classrooms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362168815606162

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Task motivation has been under-investigated.

    “In particular, task motivation, which explains 'why students behave as they do in a specific learning situation where they are carrying out a specific task' (Csizér 2017: 424-425), has been under-investigated (see Dörnyei & Kormos 2000;Kormos & Préfontaine 2016;Poupore 2016).”

    From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Poupore 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poupore, G.
Affiliations
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System (US)
Corresponding author
Poupore, Glen
Venue
Language Teaching Research
Published
2016-08-02
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
719-740
ISSN
  • 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0954
OpenAlex
W2281178368
Cited by
70
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4
FWCI
15.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
second language motivation, task motivation, language production, small group interaction, social climate, nonverbal behavior, task enjoyment, sense of achievement, Korean learners of English, speaking skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review