Cited by 188Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in EducationInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Effects of chatbot-assisted in-class debates on students’ argumentation skills and task motivation

Guo, Kai, Zhong, Yuchun, Li, Danling, Chu, Samuel Kai Wah·2023·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104862

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The University of Toronto has developed a model in which GenAI is used as a support in evaluation, but without replacing human judgment.

    “The University of Toronto, for example, has developed a model in which GenAI is used as a support in evaluation, but without replacing human judgment (Guo et al., 2023).”
  • The University of Toronto focused its GenAI implementation on learning assessment, especially automated feedback on essays and written assignments.

    “In a different approach, the University of Toronto has focused its implementation of GenAI on learning assessment, especially automated feedback on essays and written assignments.”
  • The University of Toronto framework regulates GenAI use in exams and academic papers, ensuring that final decisions remain in the hands of human professors and evaluators.

    “This framework regulates the use of GenAI in exams and academic papers, ensuring that final decisions remain in the hands of human professors and evaluators.”
  • The University of Toronto implemented an auditing system in which teachers and students can review AI recommendations to verify their validity.

    “In addition, Toronto has implemented an auditing system in which teachers and students can review the AI's recommendations to verify their validity.”
  • To ensure fairness and mitigate algorithmic biases, the University of Toronto developed a governance framework in which GenAI can only be used as a Support Tool and not as a substitute for human judgment.

    “To ensure fairness and mitigate algorithmic biases, the university has developed a governance framework in which generative AI can only be used as a Support Tool and not as a substitute for human judgment (Guo et al., 2023).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, K., Zhong, Y., Li, D., & Chu, S. K. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Li, Danling
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
203
Pages
104862
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4379619507
Cited by
188
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 7
FWCI
17.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
chatbots, argumentation skills, task motivation, argumentative dialogue, AI-assisted learning, undergraduate students, argument structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review