The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Situated willingness to communicate in an L2: Interplay of individual characteristics and context
Open accessAbstract
Recently, situated willingness to communicate (WTC) has received increasing research attention in addition to traditional quantitative studies of trait-like WTC. This article is an addition to the former but unique in two ways. First, it investigates both trait and state WTC in a classroom context and explores ways to combine the two to reach a fuller understanding of why second language (L2) learners choose (or avoid) communication at given moments. Second, it investigates the communication behavior of individuals and of the group they constitute as nested systems, with the group as context for individual performance. An interventional study was conducted in a class for English as a foreign language (EFL) with 21 students in a Japanese university. During discussion sessions in English over a semester in which Initiation–Response–Feedback (IRF) patterns were avoided to encourage students to initiate communication, qualitative data based on observations, student self-reflections, and interviews and scale-based data on trait anxiety and WTC were collected. The analyses, which focused on three selected participants, revealed how differences in the frequency of self-initiated turns emerged through the interplay of enduring characteristics, including personality and proficiency, and contextual influences such as other students’ reactions and group-level talk–silence patterns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basics of Qualitative Research
Ozanne, J. L., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172751 · Cited by 17,852
(1990) · Cited by 11,110
MACINTYRE, P. D., CLÉMENT, R., DÖRNYEI, Z., & NOELS, K. A. (1998) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x · Cited by 2,171
Self-citationIdentity and language learning : gender, ethnicity and educational change
Norton, B. (2000) · Cited by 2,023
Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational Change
Yim, Y.-K., & Norton, B. (2001) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588036 · Cited by 1,798
The Psychology of the Language Learner Revisited
Dornyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315779553 · Cited by 1,518
Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics
Cameron, L., & Larsen‐Freeman, D. (2007) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00148.x · Cited by 1,345
Willingness to Communicate in a Second Language: The Japanese EFL Context
Yashima, T. (2002) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/1540-4781.00136 · Cited by 1,308
Self-citationA Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. H. (2007) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728906002732 · Cited by 1,019
Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research
Gass, S. M., Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Mackey, A. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606006 · Cited by 969
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Fujie Y., 2000, Kyouikushinrigaku Kenkyu, 48, 21
- Korst T.J., 1997, JALT Journal, 19, 279
- Swain M., 2005, Principles and practices in applied linguistics: Studies in Honour of H.G. Widdowson, 471
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Khajavy, G. H., MacIntyre, P. D., & Barabadi, E. (2018) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263117000304 · Cited by 451
Self-citationInteraction and instructed second language acquisition
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444818000125 · Cited by 377
Joe, H.-K., Hiver, P. V., & Al‐Hoorie, A. H. (2016) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.005 · Cited by 381
Dewaele, J. (2019) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x19864996 · Cited by 285
Zhang, C., Meng, Y., & Ma, X. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103259 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Yashima, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Ikeda, M.
- Affiliations
- Kansai University (JP)
- Cape Breton University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Yashima, Tomoko
- Venue
- Language Teaching Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-07-14
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-137
- ISSN
- 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0954
- OpenAlex
- W2463465777
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 57.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
- CBU Scholar (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25370743)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- willingness to communicate, English as a foreign language, Japanese learners of English, group dynamics, trait anxiety, personality, language proficiency, classroom discussion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review