Cited by 165Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchPsychology and Mental HealthIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The `not guilty verdict': Psychological reactions to a diagnosis of Asperger syndrome in adulthood

Abstract

Asperger syndrome is a relatively new diagnostic classification. A number of factors make receiving a diagnosis of Asperger syndrome in adulthood a unique experience. This study used a phenomenological approach to examine the experiences of 10 adults receiving such a diagnosis. Results suggested that six major themes were associated with receiving a diagnosis of Asperger syndrome. Individuals discussed their negative life experiences and their experience of services prior to diagnosis, which led to individuals holding certain beliefs about the symptoms of Asperger syndrome. These beliefs had an effect on the formation of each individual's perceived self-identity. Participants made links between how they felt when they received the diagnosis and their current beliefs about both their ;symptoms' and themselves. Finally, participants highlighted the importance of the societal view of Asperger syndrome. The implications of these findings are reappraised in the context of previous research and the wider literature on identity formation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361309103795

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Cousins, E., 2001, `Exploring the Experience of a Late Diagnosis of Asperger Syndrome and High-Functioning Autism: A Review of Relevant Theory, Research and Methodology'
  2. Davies, D., 1996, `Working with People Coming Out'
  3. Lewis, K.S., 1998, Lippincotts Primary Care Practice, 2, 38
  4. Moyes, R., 2003, `Settling into the Diagnosis of Asperger Syndrome'
  5. Reid, K., 2005, The Psychologist, 18, 20
  6. Wing, L., 2003, Diagnostic Interview for Social and Communication Disorders (Eleventh Edition)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Punshon, C., Skirrow, P., & Murphy, G.
Affiliations
  • Mersey Care NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of Kent (GB)
Venue
Autism
Published
2009-05
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
265-283
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W2030351972
Cited by
165
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
Asperger syndrome, adult diagnosis, diagnostic experience, self-identity, identity construction, life experience, autism services
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Attitude to Health, Cognition Disorders, Family, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Self Concept, Social Identification, Asperger Syndrome, Friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review