Cited by 31Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareFamily and Disability Support Research

Parent and health care provider perspectives related to disclosure of autism spectrum disorder in pediatric emergency departments

Muskat, Barbara, Greenblatt, Andrea, Nicholas, David B, Ratnapalan, Savithiri, Cohen-Silver, Justine, Newton, Amanda S, Craig, William R, Kilmer, Christopher +1 more·2016·Autism

Abstract

Children and youth with autism spectrum disorder presenting in emergency departments face potential cognitive, sensory, and behavioral challenges, and it is crucial for providers to be aware of their unique needs. However, disclosure of a child's autism spectrum disorder can be complex for parental caregivers and is not well understood. This qualitative study utilized a grounded theory approach and analyzed data from 28 parents and 16 health care providers related to autism spectrum disorder disclosure within two Canadian pediatric emergency departments. Study results indicated that participants identified benefits and risks of disclosure. Encouraging understanding, expediting service, and preparing health care providers for working with children with autism spectrum disorder were identified as benefits of disclosure. Risks related to disclosure included potential negative attributions toward the children and parental discomfort in disclosing a diagnosis in front of the children. Parents discussed the health care encounters they experienced following disclosure and provided recommendations for improving the disclosure process in the emergency department. It is recommended that future research explore the experiences of parents who choose not to disclose their child's autism spectrum disorder. Greater awareness of the disclosure experience and the development of resources and tools to support communication between parents and health care providers are also recommended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361315621520

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muskat, B., Greenblatt, A., Nicholas, D. B., Ratnapalan, S., Cohen-Silver, J., Newton, A. S., Craig, W. R., Kilmer, C., & Zwaigenbaum, L.
Affiliations
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Muskat, Barbara
Venue
Autism
Published
2016-07-08
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
986-994
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W2265419971
Cited by
31
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Health Research Board
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, diagnosis disclosure, pediatric emergency department, parental attitudes, healthcare provider perspectives, children with autism, parent-provider communication
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Health, Canada, Child, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Health Personnel, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Male, Parents, Disclosure, Qualitative Research, Grounded Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review