Cited by 45Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily and Disability Support ResearchPsychology and Mental Health

A meta-ethnography of autistic people’s experiences of social camouflaging and its relationship with mental health

Open access
Field, Sarah L, Williams, Marc O, Jones, Catherine R G, Fox, John R E·2024·Autism

Abstract

Some autistic people use strategies to hide autistic behaviour and appear more neurotypical. Previous research has linked this ‘social camouflaging’ with mental health difficulties. This review synthesised qualitative research to explore the relationship between camouflaging and mental health. Thirteen studies were systematically identified, appraised and synthesised using meta-ethnography. Four third-order concepts were developed, describing camouflaging as an attempt to cope with stressful social contexts which impact mental health. Many autistic people experienced unintended negative consequences of their camouflaging that increased stress. Potential mechanisms for the relationship between camouflaging and mental health related to the qualities of the strategies that were used. Camouflaging strategies that were superficially ‘successful’ involved high levels of self-monitoring, were highly cognitively demanding or highly habitual and appeared more linked to poor mental health. This should be investigated in future research and has potential implications for how clinicians support autistic people with mental health difficulties. Lay Abstract: Some autistic people describe trying to hide autistic behaviour and seem more neurotypical. Researchers called this ‘social camouflaging’ and have linked it with mental health difficulties. We used a step-by-step approach to identify research where autistic people talk about social camouflaging to explore the relationship between camouflaging and poor mental health. Thirteen studies were combined. The results describe how society negatively impacts autistic people’s mental health, and camouflaging is a way to try and cope with this. Many autistic people find their camouflaging strategies have accidental negative consequences which also affect their mental health. Strategies which seemed ‘successful’ involved a lot of self-monitoring, were very mentally demanding or were very habitual and seemed to have more of an effect on mental health. This might be important for clinicians who support autistic people with mental health difficulties.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/13623613231223036

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social camouflaging is a known risk factor for depression, generalised and social anxiety, autistic burnout, stress, lower self-esteem, diminished authenticity, and poorer mental health outcomes.

    “Social camouflaging is a known risk factor for developing conditions such as depression, generalised and social anxiety, autistic burnout, as well as stress, lower self-esteem, diminished authenticity, and poorer mental health outcomes (Field et al., 2024;Zhuang et al., 2023).”

    From Rethinking psychological interventions in autism: Toward a neurodiversity‐affirming approach. (2025) · cites this paper as Field et al., 2024

    The Introduction reports associations between camouflaging and depression, generalised anxiety, and social anxiety. The Results and Discussion also link camouflaging with stress, burnout, inauthenticity, and poor mental health. But the paper describes a complex, potentially harmful relationship—not an established risk of developing these conditions—and the passages do not establish lower self-esteem as an outcome. Page numbers were not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tajfel H. Turner J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Hatch M. J. Schultz M. (Eds.), Organisational identity: A reader (pp. 56– 65). Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Field, S. L., Williams, M. O., Jones, C. R. G., & Fox, J. R. E.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Williams, Marc O
Venue
Autism
Published
2024-01-10
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
1328-1343
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W4390702439
Cited by
45
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
social camouflaging, mental health, autistic people, coping strategies, self-monitoring, stress, neurodiversity, clinician support
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Anthropology, Cultural, Autistic Disorder, Humans, Mental Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review