Cited by 9Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Facilitated Communication: The Contribution of Physical, Emotional and Mental Support

Konstantareas, M. Mary, Gravelle, Gregory·1998·Autism

Abstract

This study examined types of support in Facilitated Communication with 12 non-verbal individuals with autism. Literacy tasks of graduated difficulty that included letter identification, word comprehension, labelling and sentence completion were employed to address the possible presence of literacy under three conditions of support: physical, emotional and mental. Although full facilitator support resulted in high performance levels on all tasks, emotional and physical support alone yielded unintelligible or minimal output. Thus, contrary to proponents' claims as to the importance of physical and emotional support, facilitated output hinges crucially on facilitator-provided mental support. In this study this was true regardless of task difficulty and motor requirement complexity, arguing against the technique's relevance to overcoming motor or emotional problems and demonstrating literacy in individuals with autism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361398024005

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some researchers and professionals accept as self-evident that any typed communication via FC/RPM demonstrating typical or above normal linguistic competence cannot possibly be the output of a nonspeaking autistic with low language development.

    “Thus, some researchers and professionals accept as self-evident that, given the low level of language development of a nonspeaking autistic, any typed communication via FC/RPM demonstrating typical or above normal linguistic competence, cannot possibly be that individual’s output (Jacobson et al., 1995; Konstantareas and Gravelle, 1998; Simmons et al., 2021).”

    From Perspective: Presuming Autistic Communication Competence and Reframing Facilitated Communication (2022) · cites this paper as Konstantareas and Gravelle, 1998

  • There exists a prevalent presumption of incompetence affecting so-called "low functioning" or "severe" autistic individuals with CCN, accompanied by a presumed lack of ability, desire, and capacity to communicate.

    “It is an unfortunate reality that there exists a prevalent presumption of incompetence affecting so called “low functioning” or “severe” autistic individuals with CCN, that is accompanied by a presumed lack of ability, desire, and capacity to communicate.”

    From Perspective: Presuming Autistic Communication Competence and Reframing Facilitated Communication (2022) · cites this paper as Konstantareas and Gravelle, 1998

  • A series of experimental evaluations of FC in the 1990s concluded that FC was at best worthless, and at worst damaging.

    “A series of experimental evaluations of FC in the 1990s concluded that FC was at best worthless, and at worst damaging (see for example Eberlin et al., 1993; Konstantareas and Gravelle, 1998; Montee et al., 1995; Wheeler et al., 1993).”

    From Hidden communicative competence: Case study evidence using eye-tracking and video analysis (2012) · cites this paper as Konstantareas and Gravelle, 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Konstantareas, M. M., & Gravelle, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Guelph (CA)
  • Community Resource Service, Kitchener, Canada
Venue
Autism
Published
1998-12
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
389-414
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W2161059127
Cited by
9
References
4
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Autism (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
facilitated communication, literacy, facilitator support, psychological support, physical support, emotional support, letter recognition, word comprehension, sentence completion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review