Facilitated Communication: The Contribution of Physical, Emotional and Mental Support
Abstract
This study examined types of support in Facilitated Communication with 12 non-verbal individuals with autism. Literacy tasks of graduated difficulty that included letter identification, word comprehension, labelling and sentence completion were employed to address the possible presence of literacy under three conditions of support: physical, emotional and mental. Although full facilitator support resulted in high performance levels on all tasks, emotional and physical support alone yielded unintelligible or minimal output. Thus, contrary to proponents' claims as to the importance of physical and emotional support, facilitated output hinges crucially on facilitator-provided mental support. In this study this was true regardless of task difficulty and motor requirement complexity, arguing against the technique's relevance to overcoming motor or emotional problems and demonstrating literacy in individuals with autism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some researchers and professionals accept as self-evident that any typed communication via FC/RPM demonstrating typical or above normal linguistic competence cannot possibly be the output of a nonspeaking autistic with low language development.
“Thus, some researchers and professionals accept as self-evident that, given the low level of language development of a nonspeaking autistic, any typed communication via FC/RPM demonstrating typical or above normal linguistic competence, cannot possibly be that individual’s output (Jacobson et al., 1995; Konstantareas and Gravelle, 1998; Simmons et al., 2021).”
From Perspective: Presuming Autistic Communication Competence and Reframing Facilitated Communication (2022) · cites this paper as Konstantareas and Gravelle, 1998
There exists a prevalent presumption of incompetence affecting so-called "low functioning" or "severe" autistic individuals with CCN, accompanied by a presumed lack of ability, desire, and capacity to communicate.
“It is an unfortunate reality that there exists a prevalent presumption of incompetence affecting so called “low functioning” or “severe” autistic individuals with CCN, that is accompanied by a presumed lack of ability, desire, and capacity to communicate.”
From Perspective: Presuming Autistic Communication Competence and Reframing Facilitated Communication (2022) · cites this paper as Konstantareas and Gravelle, 1998
A series of experimental evaluations of FC in the 1990s concluded that FC was at best worthless, and at worst damaging.
“A series of experimental evaluations of FC in the 1990s concluded that FC was at best worthless, and at worst damaging (see for example Eberlin et al., 1993; Konstantareas and Gravelle, 1998; Montee et al., 1995; Wheeler et al., 1993).”
From Hidden communicative competence: Case study evidence using eye-tracking and video analysis (2012) · cites this paper as Konstantareas and Gravelle, 1998
Cites
Jacobson, J. W., Mulick, J. A., & Schwartz, A. A. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.9.750 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Bebko, J. M., Perry, A., & Bryson, S. (1996) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/bf02276233 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Getting the words out: Facilitated communication training
Crossley, R., & Remington-Gurney, J. (1992) · Topics in Language Disorders · doi:10.1097/00011363-199208000-00004 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Getting the words out: Case studies in facilitated communication training
Crossley, R. (1992) · Topics in Language Disorders · doi:10.1097/00011363-199208000-00005 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lilienfeld, S. O., Marshall, J., Todd, J. T., & Shane, H. C. (2014) · Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention · doi:10.1080/17489539.2014.976332 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Perspective: Presuming Autistic Communication Competence and Reframing Facilitated Communication
Heyworth, M., Chan, T., & Lawson, W. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.864991 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Facilitated Communication and Authorship: A Systematic Review
Schlosser, R. W., Balandin, S., Hemsley, B., Iacono, T., Probst, P., & von Tetzchner, S. (2014) · Augmentative and Alternative Communication · doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.971490 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Hidden communicative competence: Case study evidence using eye-tracking and video analysis
Grayson, A., Emerson, A., Howard-Jones, P., & O’Neil, L. (2012) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361310393260 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Can’t or won’t? Evidence relating to authorship in facilitated communication
Emerson, A., Grayson, A., & Griffiths, A. (2001) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.3109/13682820109177866 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Konstantareas, M. M., & Gravelle, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Guelph (CA)
- Community Resource Service, Kitchener, Canada
- Venue
- Autism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 389-414
- ISSN
- 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7005
- OpenAlex
- W2161059127
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Autism (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Keywords
- facilitated communication, literacy, facilitator support, psychological support, physical support, emotional support, letter recognition, word comprehension, sentence completion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review