Cited by 590Education Discipline and InequalityCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and Penology

Preparing for prison?: The criminalization of school discipline in the USA

Hirschfield, Paul J.·2008·Theoretical Criminology

Abstract

American schools increasingly define and manage the problem of student discipline through a prism of crime control. Most theoretical explanations fail to situate school criminalization in a broader structural context, to fully explain its spatio-temporal variations, and to specify the processes and subjectivities that mediate between structural and legal forces and the behavior of school actors. A multilevel structural model of school criminalization is developed which posits that a troubled domestic economy, the mass unemployment and incarceration of disadvantaged minorities, and resulting fiscal crises in urban public education have shifted school disciplinary policies and practices and staff perceptions of poor students of color in a manner that promotes greater punishment and exclusion of students perceived to be on a criminal justice `track'.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362480607085795

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Schools have evolved from relatively open sites for learning to settings that replicate the features of control and surveillance common to the criminal legal system.

    “the evolution of schools from relatively open sites for learning to settings that replicate the features of control and surveillance common to the criminal legal system (Hirschfield 2008;Kupchik and Monahan 2006;Rios 2017).”
  • Carceral logics and practices are imported to seemingly unrelated institutions such as schools, the child welfare system, health care facilities, and the immigration system.

    “carceral logics and practices are imported to seemingly unrelated institutions such as schools (Hirschfield 2008; Rios 2017), the child welfare system (Edwards 2016;Roberts 2022), health care facilities (Lara-Millán 2014), and the immigration system (Fassin 2011).”
  • Schools have become 'prison-like' through investments in surveillance, the arrival of police officers on campus, and zero tolerance policies that mirror the punitive shift of the criminal legal system.

    “a large body of scholarship during the prison boom describes how schools have become “prison-like” through investments in surveillance, the arrival of police officers on campus, and zero tolerance policies that mirror the punitive shift of the criminal legal system (Hirschfield 2008;Rios 2017;Hirschfield and Celinska 2011;Wolf and Kupchik 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hirschfield, P. J.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Hirschfield, Paul J.
Venue
Theoretical Criminology
Published
2008-02
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
79-101
ISSN
  • 1362-4806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7439
OpenAlex
W2033220942
Cited by
590
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 17
FWCI
52.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Theoretical Criminology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
student discipline, school discipline policy, crime control, incarceration, mass unemployment, fiscal crisis, students of color, punishment in schools, school exclusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review