Cited by 10Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsHealth, Medicine and SocietyEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Involuntary psychiatric treatment and the erosion of consent: A critical discourse analysis of mental health legislation in British Columbia, Canada

Open access
Kolar, Maja, Varcoe, Colleen, Brown, Helen, Einboden, Rochelle·2023·Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine

Abstract

The Mental Health Act (1996) is legislation that directs voluntary and involuntary psychiatric treatment for people experiencing mental health issues in British Columbia (BC), Canada. This critical discursive analysis explores how BC's Mental Health Act (1996) and the Guide to the Mental Health Act (2005) structure involuntary psychiatric treatment and illustrates how the discourses within these texts constitute people experiencing mental health issues as passive recipients of care. Understandings of people experiencing mental health issues as pathological, incapable, vulnerable and dangerous justify their need for protection and the protection of others. Protection is identified as a central legitimising discourse in the use of involuntary psychiatric treatment. Further, these texts define the roles and responsibilities of police, physicians and nurses in authorising and implementing involuntary psychiatric treatment. This analysis describes how this legislation erodes consent and entrenches social marginalisation. Alternatively, discourses of equity have potential to transform health care practices and structures that reproduce discourses of deficit, vulnerability and dangerousness, shifting towards promotion of the rights and safety of people experiencing mental health issues and crises.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/13634593221096241

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • British Columbia's Mental Health Act operates on a "deemed consent" model: once a person is detained involuntarily, they are deemed to have consented to any psychiatric treatment that follows.

    “Unlike most other jurisdictions in Canada, the BC MH Act operates on a “deemed consent” model, which assumes that once a person is detained involuntarily under the MH Act, they are deemed to have consented to any psychiatric treatment that follows [3].”

    From “Backed into a Corner”: Lived experiences of receiving and providing involuntary psychiatric treatment under British Columbia’s Mental Health Act (2026) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) explicitly describes BC’s approach as ‘deemed consent’ and says consent to any psychiatric treatment the treating physician deems appropriate is assumed during involuntary treatment. The section ‘Constitutions of the “Involuntary Patient”’ links this treatment authority to involuntary-patient status. The paper does not establish the citing sentence’s additional comparison that most other Canadian jurisdictions use a different model. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Abramowitz JS (2015) The biomedical model: Caveat emptor. The Behavior Therapist 38(7): 169- 171.
  2. Ahmadvand M (2011) Critical discourse analysis: An introduction to major approaches. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Bahasa dan Budaya 5(1): 82– 90.
  3. Canadian Nurses Association (2017) Code of ethics for registered nurses. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Nurses Association. Available at: https://hl-prod-ca-oc-download.s3-ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/CNA/2f975e7e-4a40-45ca-863c-5ebf0a138d5e/UploadedImages/documents/Code_of_Ethics_2017_Edition_Secure_Interactive.pdf (accessed 20 April 2019). 9505717
  4. Fraser G (2015) Governing madness: Coercion, resistance and agency in British Columbia’s mental health law regime. PhD Thesis, University of Victoria, BC.
  5. Gooding P McSherry B Roper C, et al. (2018) Alternatives to coercion in mental health settings: a literature review. Melbourne: Melbourne Social Wquity Institute, University of Melbourne. Available at: http://recoverycollege.ie/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Alternatives-to-Coercion-Literature-Review-Melbourne-Social-Equity-Institute-1.pdf (accessed 4 June 2019).
  6. Ingram R Wasik A Cormier R, et al. (2013) Social Inequities and Mental Health: A Scoping Review. Vancouver, BC: Centre for the Study of Gender, Social Inequities and Mental Health.
  7. Karban K (2016) Developing a health inequalities approach for mental health social work. British Journal of Social Work 47(3): 885– 992.
  8. Kolar M (2018) Involuntary and coercive psychiatric treatment: A critical discourse analysis of British Columbia’s Mental Health Act. MSN Thesis, University of British Columbia. Available at: https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0375715 (accessed 1 April 2019). PMC10588262 35531879
  9. McWade B (2016) Recovery-as-policy as a form of neoliberal state making. Intersectional Ties: A Global Journal of Social Work Analysis, Research, Polity, and Practice 5(3): 62– 81.
  10. Mental Health Act RSBC Chapter 288 (1996) Available at: http://www.bclaws.ca/civix/document/id/consol30/consol30/96288_01 (accessed 1 April 2019).
  11. Morrow M Dagg PK Pederson A (2008) Is deinstitutionalization a “failed experiment”? The ethics of re-institutionalization. Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 3(2): 1– 7.
  12. Van Dijk TA (2001) Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In: Wodak R Meyer M (eds) Mental Health and Canadian Society: Historical Perspectives. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 95– 120.

Cited by

Authors
Kolar, M., Varcoe, C., Brown, H., & Einboden, R.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Kolar, Maja
Venue
Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine
Published
2022-05-09
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
1076-1095
ISSN
  • 1363-4593 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7196
OpenAlex
W4229368545
Cited by
10
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
involuntary psychiatric treatment, mental health law, informed consent, deficit discourse, dangerousness, social marginalisation, equity in mental health care, British Columbia
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, British Columbia, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Humans, Informed Consent, Mental Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review