Cited by 18Gender and Feminist StudiesLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender, Feminism, and Media

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Something a bit more personal”: Digital storytelling and intimacy among queer Black women

Adams-Santos, Dominique·2020·Sexualities

Abstract

Coming-out stories are important cultural texts wherein individuals articulate and interpret experiences of identifying as sexual minorities. Yet, much of the extant literature on coming-out stories examines narratives by white, middle-class gay men and lesbians. Critical inquiry into coming-out stories told by privileged queer subjects points to the formulaic and normative characteristics of their narratives, where sexual difference is downplayed or challenged. The goal of this article, then, is to ask whether and how coming-out narratives told by queer Black women conform to or depart from the “coming-out formula story.” Using an intersectional approach to narrative analysis, this article investigates the performative and discursive strategies that 50 women use in telling their coming-out stories on YouTube. Findings show that queer Black women’s use of intimate candor—the performative and discursive strategy of publicly revealing interior, often sexually explicit, aspects of the self—is a means through which women center desire and queerness; articulate a vision of queer Black womanhood; and complicate the coming-out formula.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1363460720902720

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1177/1363460716665783 · DOI
  2. Beer D and Burrows R (2007) Sociology and, of, and in Web 2.0: Some initial considerations. Sociological Research Online 12(5): 17. · DOI
  3. 10.1215/9780822389163 · DOI
  4. Berryman R and Kavka M (2018) Crying on YouTube: Vlogs, self-exposure and the productivity of negative affect. Convergence 24(1): 85–98. · DOI
  5. 10.1177/1363460713511101 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/1469540514521081 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1753-9137.2010.01075.x · DOI
  8. 10.7208/chicago/9780226190518.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.4324/9780203309506 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1177/0891241603259810 · DOI
  11. Dobson AS, Robards R and Carah N (2018) Digital Intimate Publics and Social Media. London: Palgrave Macmillan. · DOI
  12. 10.1215/9780822383901-007 · DOI
  13. 10.1215/9780822392828 · DOI
  14. 10.1353/aq.2019.0010 · DOI
  15. Goffman E, 1959, The Presentation of Everyday Life
  16. 10.1177/1363460713516785 · DOI
  17. Hammonds E, 1994, Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 6, 126, 10.1215/10407391-6-2-3-126 · DOI
  18. 10.1515/9781474471770-012 · DOI
  19. Helsper EJ and Eynon R (2010) Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal 36(3): 503–520. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Higginbotham EB, 1993, Righteous Discontent: The Women’s Movement in the Black Baptist Church, 1880–1920
  21. 10.1177/1363460714550900 · DOI
  22. 10.1086/494552 · DOI
  23. Holland M, 2016, Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 7, 52
  24. 10.1215/23289252-2815255 · DOI
  25. Hunter MA (2010) All the gays are White and all the Blacks are straight: Black gay men, identity, and community. Sexuality Research & Social Policy (7): 81–92. · DOI
  26. 10.1057/9781137297792_2 · DOI
  27. Jenkins CM, 2007, Private Lives, Proper Relations: Regulating Black Intimacy
  28. Jones C and Czerniewicz L (2010) Describing or debunking? The net generation and digital natives. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26(5): 317–320. · DOI
  29. 10.1177/1363460715583585 · DOI
  30. Kohler Riessman C, 2005, Narrative, Memory and Everyday Life, 1
  31. 10.4324/9780203102329 · DOI
  32. Lorde A (1984) The Transformation of Silence into Language and Action. In Sister Outsider. Trumansberg, NY: Crossing Press, pp. 40–44.
  33. Loseke D, 2017, Social Problems: Constructionist Readings
  34. 10.1177/1367877917720237 · DOI
  35. Lupton D (2016) Digital Risk Society. In: Burgess A, Alemanno A and Zinn J (eds) Routledge Handbook of Risk Studies. London: Routledge, pp. 301–309.
  36. 10.1080/0740770X.2011.563048 · DOI
  37. 10.1177/1461444810365313 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1177/1470357203002002004 · DOI
  39. Miguel C (2016) Visual Intimacy on Social Media: From Selfies to the Co-Construction of Intimacies Through Shared Pictures. Social Media + Society 2(2): 1–10. · DOI
  40. 10.1525/9780520950153 · DOI
  41. Moreno MA, Goniu N, Moreno PS, et al. (2013) Ethics of Social Media Research: Common Concerns and Practical Considerations. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 16(9): 708–713. · DOI
  42. Morgan J (2015) Why We Get Off: Moving Towards a Black Feminist Politics of Pleasure. The Black Scholar 45(4): 36–46. · DOI
  43. 10.1353/fem.2012.0008 · DOI
  44. 10.4324/9780203425268 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/10304312.2010.506672 · DOI
  46. Purdie-Vaughns V and Eibach RP (2008) Intersectional Invisibility: The Distinctive Advantages and Disadvantages of Multiple Subordinate-Group Identities. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 59(5-6): 377–391. · DOI
  47. Raun T (2012) DIY Therapy: Exploring Affective Self-Representations in Trans Video Blogs on YouTube. In: Karatzogianni A and Kuntsman A (eds) Digital Cultures and the Politics of Emotion. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 165–180. · DOI
  48. 10.1177/1367877913513696 · DOI
  49. 10.1002/ace.370 · DOI
  50. 10.1504/IJWBC.2010.033755 · DOI
  51. 10.1007/s10508-006-8996-8 · DOI
  52. 10.3138/9781442687035 · DOI
  53. 10.1177/1363460717713381 · DOI
  54. 10.1177/1363460708091742 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Adams-Santos, D.
Affiliations
Northwestern University, USA
Venue
Sexualities
Published
2020-03-04
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
1434-1456
ISSN
  • 1363-4607 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7382
OpenAlex
W3009460457
Cited by
18
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sexualities (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
Keywords
Black queer women, digital storytelling, intimacy, YouTube, intersectionality, performative strategies, discursive strategies, sexual difference, desire, sexual minority identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Something a bit more personal”: Digital storytelling and intimacy among queer Black women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1363460720902720
The paper
Adams-Santos, D. (2020). “Something a bit more personal”: Digital storytelling and intimacy among queer Black women. Sexualities. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460720902720