Cited by 41Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyMental Health Treatment and AccessReligion, Society, and Development

How can mental health and faith-based practitioners work together? A case study of collaborative mental health in Gujarat, India

Shields, Laura, Chauhan, Ajay, Bakre, Ravindra, Hamlai, Milesh, Lynch, Durwin, Bunders, Joske·2016·Transcultural Psychiatry

Abstract

Despite the knowledge that people with mental illness often seek care from multiple healing systems, there is limited collaboration between these systems. Greater collaboration with existing community resources could narrow the treatment gap and reduce fragmentation by encouraging more integrated care. This paper explores the origins, use, and outcomes of a collaborative programme between faith-based and allopathic mental health practitioners in India. We conducted 16 interviews with key stakeholders and examined demographic and clinical characteristics of the user population. Consistent with previous research, we found that collaboration is challenging and requires trust, rapport-building, and open dialogue. The collaboration reached a sizeable population, was reviewed favourably by key stakeholders—particularly on health improvement and livelihood restoration—and perhaps most importantly, views the client holistically, allowing for both belief systems to play a shared role in care and recovery. Results support the idea that, despite differing practices, collaboration between faith-based and allopathic mental health practitioners can be achieved and can benefit clients with otherwise limited access to mental health care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1363461516649835

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shields, L., Chauhan, A., Bakre, R., Hamlai, M., Lynch, D., & Bunders, J.
Affiliations
  • Trimbos Institute/Netherlands Institute for Mental Health and Addiction, the Netherlands
  • Hospital for Mental Health, India
  • Altruist, India
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Transcultural Psychiatry
Published
2016-05-19
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
368-391
ISSN
  • 1363-4615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7471
OpenAlex
W2405826720
Cited by
41
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transcultural Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion, Society, and Development
Keywords
interprofessional collaboration, integrated care, treatment gap, mental illness, community mental health, holistic care, trust and rapport, Gujarat, access to mental health care
MeSH terms
Help-Seeking Behavior, Adult, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Cooperative Behavior, Female, Humans, India, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Faith Healing, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review