Cited by 180Community Health and DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and AccessMental Health and Patient Involvement

The role of communities in advancing the goals of the Movement for Global Mental Health

Open access
Campbell, Catherine, Burgess, Rochelle·2012·Transcultural Psychiatry

Abstract

This special section of Transcultural Psychiatry explores the local-global spaces of engagement being opened up by the Movement for Global Mental Health, with particular emphasis on the need for expanded engagement with local communities. Currently the Movement places its main emphasis on scaling up mental health services and advocating for the rights of the mentally ill, framed within universalised western understandings of health, healing and personhood. The papers in this section emphasise the need for greater attention to the impacts of context, culture and local survival strategies on peoples’ responses to adversity and illness, greater acknowledgement of the agency and resilience of vulnerable communities and increased attention to the way in which power inequalities and social injustices frame peoples’ opportunities for mental health. In this Introduction, we highlight ways in which greater community involvement opens up possibilities for tackling each of these challenges. Drawing on community health psychology, we outline our conceptualisation of “community mental health competence” defined as the ability of community members to work collectively to facilitate more effective prevention, care, treatment and advocacy. We highlight the roles of multi-level dialogue, critical thinking and partnerships in facilitating both the “voice” of vulnerable communities as well as “receptive social environments” where powerful groups are willing to recognise communities’ needs and assist them in working for improved well-being. Respectful local-global alliances have a key role to play in this process. The integration of local community struggles for mental health into an energetic global activist Movement opens up exciting possibilities for translating the Movement’s calls for improved global mental health from rhetoric to reality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1363461512454643

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Global mental health has relied on a strategic and convincing public discourse to legitimise its existence, operations, and funding pledges.

    “the field of global mental health has relied on a strategic and convincing public discourse to legitimise its existence, operations, and funding pledges”

    From Throwing therapy at the problem mental health and humanitarian intervention in Palabek refugee settlement, northern Uganda (2023) · cites this paper as Campbell and Burgess 2012

    The Abstract describes the Movement’s biomedical framing as an arguably astute political strategy and says a clear message is likely to convince governments and attract donors. It does not establish that the field relied on this discourse to legitimise its operations or secure funding pledges; those parts of the claim are stronger than the passage supports. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Apfell-Marglin, F., & Marglin, S. (Eds.). (1990). Dominating knowledge: Development, cul- ture and resistance. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
  2. Blane, D., Brunner, E., & Wilkinson, R. (Eds.). (1996). Health and social organisation: Towards a health policy for the twenty-first century. London, UK: Routledge.
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-248). New York, NY: Greenwood.
  4. Campbell, C., Cornish, F., Gibbs, A., & Scott, K. (2010). Heeding the push from below: How do social movements persuade the rich to listen to the poor? Journal of Health Psychology, 15(7), 962-971.
  5. Campbell, C., & Jovchelovitch, S. (2000). Health, community and development: Towards a social psychology of participation. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 255-270.
  6. Campbell, C., & MacPhail, C. (2002). Peer education, gender and the development of critical consciousness. Social Science & Medicine, 55(2), 331-345.
  7. Campbell, C., Skovdal, M., & Gregson, S. (2011, June). ''We, the AIDS people. . .'': Through what mechanisms has antiretroviral therapy created a context for ARV users to resist stigma and construct positive identities?. American Journal of Public Health, 101(6), 1004-1010.
  8. Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  9. Gregson, S. (in press) Evaluation of community responses to HIV/AIDS. AIDS Care.
  10. Haaken, J. (2010). Hard knocks: Domestic violence and the psychology of story-telling. London, UK: Routledge.
  11. Habermas, J. (1989). The public sphere: An encyclopaedia article. In S. Bronner, & M. Douglas (Eds.), Critical theory and society: A reader (pp. 136-142). London, UK: Routledge.
  12. Herod, A., & Wright, M. (2002). Geographies of power: Placing scale. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  13. Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in Context: Representations, community and culture. London, UK: Routledge.
  14. Kagan, C. M., Burton, M., Duckett, P. S., Lawthom, R., & Siddiquee, A. (2011). Critical Community Psychology. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  15. Kakuma, R., Minas, H., van Ginneken, N., Dal Poz, M. R., Desiraju, K., Morris, J. E., . . . Scheffler, R. M. (2011). Human resources for mental health care: Current situation and strategies for action. Lancet, 378(9803), 1654-1663.
  16. Kirmayer, L. J. (2006). Beyond the ''new cross-cultural psychiatry'': Cultural biology, dis- cursive psychology and the ironies of globalization. Transcultural Psychiatry, 43(1), 126-144.
  17. Kleinman, A. (1980). Patients and healers in the context of culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  18. Kleintjes, S., Lund, C., Swartz, L., Flisher, A., & The MHaPP Research Programme Consortium. (2010). Mental healthcare user participation in mental health policy devel- opment and implementation in South Africa. International Review of Psychiatry, 22(6), 568-577.
  19. Lewis, D., & Mosse, D. (2006). Encountering order and disjuncture: Contemporary anthropological perspectives on the organisation of development. Oxford Development Studies, 34(1), 1-13.
  20. Massey, D. (1999). Spaces of politics. In D. Massey, J. Allen, & P. Sarre (Eds.), Human Geography Today (pp. 279-294). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  21. Patel, V., Collins, P., Copeland, J., Kakuma, R., Katontoka, S., Lamichhane, J., . . . Skeen, S. (2011). The movement for global mental health. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 198, 88-90.
  22. Read, U. M., Adiibokah, E., & Nyame, S. (2009). Local suffering and the global discourse of mental health and human rights: An ethnographic study of responses to mental illness in rural Ghana. Global Health, 5, 13. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-5-13 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Robins, S., & von Lires, B. (2004). Remaking citizenship, unmaking marginalization: The Treatment Action Campaign in post-apartheid South Africa. Canadian Journal of African Studies, 38(3), 575-586.
  24. Saraceno, B., van Ommeren, M., Batniji, R., Cohen, A., Gureje, O., Mahoney, J., . . . Underhill, C. (2007). Barriers to improvement of mental health services in low- income and middle-income countries. Lancet, 370(9593), 1164-1174.
  25. Seckinelgin, H. (2008). The international politics of HIV/AIDS: Global disease À local pain. Routledge, UK: London.
  26. Skovdal, M. (2012). Pathologising healthy children? A review of the literature exploring the mental health of HIV-affected children in sub-Saharan Africa. Transcultural Psychiatry, 49, 461-491.
  27. Skovdal, M., & Andreouli, E. (2011). Using identity and recognition as a framework to understand and promote the resilience of caregiving children in Western Kenya. Journal of Social Policy, 40(3), 613-630.
  28. Skovdal, M., Ogutu, V. O., Aoro, C., & Campbell, C. (2009). Young carers as social actors: Coping strategies of children caring for ailing or ageing guardians in Western Kenya. Social Science & Medicine, 69(4), 587-595.
  29. Stoppard, J. (2000). Understanding depression: Feminist social constructionist approaches. London, UK: Routledge.
  30. Summerfield, D. (2001). The invention of post-traumatic stress disorder and the social use- fulness of a psychiatric category. British Medical Journal, 322(7278), 95-98.
  31. Summerfield, D. (2008). How scientifically valid is the knowledge base of global mental health? British Medical Journal, 336(7651), 992-994.
  32. Swyngedouw, E. (2002). Neither global nor local: ''Globalisation'' and the politics of scale. In A. Herod & M. Wright (Eds.), Geographies of power: Placing scale (pp. 137-164). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  33. World Health Organization (WHO). (2005a). Mental health: Facing the challenges, building solutions. Report from the WHO European Ministerial Conference. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campbell, C., & Burgess, R.
Affiliations
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Campbell, Catherine
Venue
Transcultural Psychiatry
Published
2012-07
Volume
49
Issue
3-4
Pages
379-395
ISSN
  • 1363-4615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7471
OpenAlex
W2167951754
Cited by
180
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transcultural Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
community participation, mental health advocacy, rights of the mentally ill, power imbalance, social justice, cultural context of mental illness, community resilience
MeSH terms
Community Mental Health Services, Community-Institutional Relations, Community Participation, Goals, Humans, Mental Health, Patient Advocacy, Poverty, Social Environment, Socioeconomic Factors, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Mentally Ill Persons, Health Status Disparities, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review