Cited by 16Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Cultural expressions of depression and the development of the Indonesian Depression Checklist

Widiana, Herlina Siwi, Simpson, Katrina, Manderson, Lenore·2018·Transcultural Psychiatry

Abstract

Depression may manifest differently across cultural settings, suggesting the value of an assessment tool that is sensitive enough to capture these variations. The study reported in this article aimed to develop a depression screening tool for Indonesians derived from ethnographic interviews with 20 people who had been diagnosed as having depression by clinical psychologists at primary health centers. The tool, which we have termed the Indonesian Depression Checklist (IDC), consists of 40 items. The tool was administered to 125 people assessed to have depression by 40 clinical psychologists in primary health centers. The data were analyzed with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) (IBM SPSS AMOS Software). CFA identified a five-factor hierarchical model ( χ 2 = 168.157, p = .091; CFI = .963; TLI = .957; RMSEA = .036). A 19-item inventory of the IDC, with five factors – Physical Symptoms, Affect, Cognition, Social Engagement and Religiosity – was identified. There was a strong correlation between the total score of the IDC and total score of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale (revised version CES-D), a standard tool for assessing symptoms of depression. The IDC accommodates culturally distinctive aspects of depression among Indonesians that are not included in the CES-D.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1363461518764491

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior to the development and implementation of such interventions, numerous barriers including culturally sensitive screening of perinatal psychological distress need to be addressed.

    “However, prior to the development and implementation of such interventions, numerous barriers including culturally sensitive screening of perinatal psychological distress need to be addressed (Widiana et al., 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Widiana, H. S., Simpson, K., & Manderson, L.
Affiliations
  • Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (ID)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Corresponding author
Widiana, Herlina Siwi
Venue
Transcultural Psychiatry
Published
2018-04-10
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
339-360
ISSN
  • 1363-4615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7471
OpenAlex
W2797060064
Cited by
16
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transcultural Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Indonesia Endownment Fund for Education (20130722080077)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
depression, depression screening, cross-cultural assessment, Indonesian people, CES-D, factor structure, somatic symptoms, religiosity, social engagement, affect, cognition
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Indonesia, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review