Cited by 120Mental Health and PsychiatryCultural, Psychoanalytic, and Sociopolitical ReflectionsPsychology and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Culture-bound syndromes, idioms of distress, and cultural concepts of distress: New directions for an old concept in psychological anthropology

Open access
Kaiser, Bonnie N., Jo Weaver, Lesley·2019·Transcultural Psychiatry

Abstract

This issue of Transcultural Psychiatry showcases some recent work on idioms of distress – the latest in a long line of anthropological research concerned with cross-cultural concepts and experiences of distress. Mark Nichter’s (1981) seminal paper introducing idioms of distress has become a cynosure for psychological anthropology and transcultural psychiatry. A growing body of work has since accumulated; however, the last time a collection of such research was brought together was the 2010 publication of a special issue in the journal Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry organized by Devon Hinton and Roberto Lewis-Fernández. In the decade since, new questions have arisen about the boundaries and applications of idioms of distress research. In this introduction, we provide a brief history of work on idioms of distress and related concepts. Then, we introduce several major themes explored by the papers in this special issue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1363461519862708

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rubel A. J., 1991, Susto: A folk illness

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 120

Metadata

Authors
Kaiser, B. N., & Jo Weaver, L.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Oregon
Corresponding author
Kaiser, Bonnie N.
Venue
Transcultural Psychiatry
Published
2019-07-26
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
589-598
ISSN
  • 1363-4615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7471
OpenAlex
W2966423182
Cited by
120
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
FWCI
59.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transcultural Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH113288)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural, Psychoanalytic, and Sociopolitical Reflections
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
idioms of distress, culture-bound syndromes, cultural concepts of distress, psychological anthropology
MeSH terms
Ethnopsychology, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Language, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review