The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Power in Transition: An Interdisciplinary Framework to Study Power in Relation to Structural Change
Open accessAbstract
This article conceptualizes power in the context of long-term process of structural change. First, it discusses the field of transition studies, which deals with processes of structural change in societal systems on the basis of certain presumptions about power relations, but still lacks an explicit conceptualization of power. Then the article discusses some prevailing points of contestation in debates on power. It is argued that for the context of transition studies, it is necessary to develop an interdisciplinary framework in which power is explicitly conceptualized in relation to change. Subsequently, such a framework is presented, with reference to existing literature on power. Starting with a philosophical and operational definition of power, a typology is developed of the different ways in which power can be exercised, explicitly including innovative power and transformative power. Finally, the presented power framework is applied to transition studies, redefining pivotal transition concepts in terms of power and formulating hypotheses on the role of power in transitions. By doing so, the article not only offers an interdisciplinary framework to study power in the context of transition studies, but also contributes to power debates more generally by including innovation and transformation as acts of power, and thereby proposes a re-conceptualization of the relation between power and structural change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
Lukes, S. (2005) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,653
Mills, C. W. (1956) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,631
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952796 · Cited by 3,387
Foucault, M. (1998) · Ethische und politische Freiheit · doi:10.1515/9783110815764.387 · Cited by 3,248
Clegg, S. (1989) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446279267 · Cited by 2,330
More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy
Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & van Asselt, M. (2001) · Foresight · doi:10.1108/14636680110803003 · Cited by 2,100
Self-citationMann, M. (1986) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511570896 · Cited by 1,683
Caution! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management
Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2007) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a39310 · Cited by 1,012
(1998) · University of Twente Research Information · Cited by 950
Cited by
An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions
Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., et al. (2019) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 · Cited by 2,800
Self-citationWhat is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability
Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012 · Cited by 1,712
Geels, F. W. (2014) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276414531627 · Cited by 1,636
The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism?
Martin, C. J. (2016) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.027 · Cited by 1,327
Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change
Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015 · Cited by 1,077
Metadata
- Authors
- Avelino, F., & Rotmans, J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Social Theory
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 543-569
- ISSN
- 1368-4310 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7137
- OpenAlex
- W2123868388
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 61.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power in Transition: An Interdisciplinary Framework to Study Power in Relation to Structural Change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1368431009349830
- The paper
- Avelino, F., & Rotmans, J. (2009). Power in Transition: An Interdisciplinary Framework to Study Power in Relation to Structural Change. European Journal of Social Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431009349830
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.