The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trust and reciprocity: a theoretical distinction of the sources of social capital.
Abstract
The social capital literature has focused on the functional and structural properties of social relations, partially neglecting the way in which they are experienced by individuals. Drawing on anthropological and social theory, this article distinguishes two ideal-typical forms of social capital — reciprocity and trust — based on the meaning of the social relations that embed them. Reciprocity is the type of social capital embedded within personal relations, triply defined in the factual, social and temporal dimensions by co-presence, reciprocity and memory, respectively. Trust is the type of social capital embedded within relations with strangers, defined by the condition of impersonality or anonymity. These two types of social capital cannot be reduced to extremes in a continuum, nor are they fungible, and while reciprocity is by definition particularistic (this is the source of its strength as a linking mechanism), trust has a universalistic potential. Analytical and empirical implications of this distinction are outlined.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Social support and trust in people and institutions represent a significant social resource that influences one’s sense of control and an individual’s perceived ability to solve a problem (Beck et al., 1985; Delhey and Newton, 2003; Torche and Valenzuela, 2011).”
From Intolerance of Uncertainty and Tendency to Worry as Mediators Between Trust in Institutions and Social Support and Fear of Coronavirus and Consequences of the Pandemic (2021) · cites this paper as Torche and Valenzuela, 2011
Citations
Cites
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225469 · Cited by 40,491
Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness
Granovetter, M. (1985) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228311 · Cited by 28,745
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital
Coleman, J. S. (1988) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228943 · Cited by 26,975
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital
Coleman, J. S. (2000) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-7222-1.50005-2 · Cited by 21,751
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
Riggins, F. J., & Mitra, S. (1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-6637 · Cited by 16,590
Bourdıeu, P. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470755679.ch15 · Cited by 14,055
Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital
Putnam, R. D. (1995) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002 · Cited by 14,037
Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age
Giddens, A. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003060963-59 · Cited by 13,399
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Coleman J., 1987, Public and Private Schools: The Impact of Communities
- Durlauf S., 2004, Social capital. NBER Working Paper
- Ensminger J., 2001, Reputations, trust, and the principal-agent problem
- Hanifan L., 1920, The Community Center
- Hardin R., 1991, Trusting persons, trusting institutions
- Hart K., 2000, Kinship, contract, and trust: the economic organization of migrants in an African city slum
- Luhmann N., 1995, Social Systems
- Mauss M., 1967, The Gift: Form and Function of Exchange in Archaic Society
- Portes A., 1995, Economic sociology and the sociology of immigration: a conceptual overview
- Portes A., 1996, The American Prospect, 26, 18
- Silver A., 1998, Two different sorts of commerce-friendship and strangership in civil society
- Valenzuela E., 2000, Estudios Publicos, 77, 321
- Weber M., 1970, Economy and Society
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ganguly, A., Talukdar, A., & Chatterjee, D. (2019) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-03-2018-0190 · Cited by 693
Integration or Isolation? Refugees’ Social Connections and Wellbeing
Strang, A. B., & Quinn, N. (2019) · Journal of Refugee Studies · doi:10.1093/jrs/fez040 · Cited by 219
Kim, S., Chung, Y., Perry, M. J., Kawachi, I. I., & Subramanian, S. V. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030602 · Cited by 164
Four Interpretations of Social Capital
Scrivens, K., & Smith, C. (2013) · OECD statistics working papers · doi:10.1787/5jzbcx010wmt-en · Cited by 152
Thomas, A., & Gupta, V. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.664638 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Torche, F., & Valenzuela, E.
- Affiliations
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
- Corresponding author
- Torche, Florencia
- Venue
- European Journal of Social Theory
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 181-198
- ISSN
- 1368-4310 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7137
- OpenAlex
- W2158045472
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 24.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Social Theory (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ford Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Capital and Social Class
- Keywords
- social capital, trust, reciprocity, interpersonal relationships, anonymity, particularism, universalism, linkage mechanism, memory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review