Cited by 23Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPhysical Activity and HealthDiabetes Management and Research

A lifestyle intervention in primary care prevents deterioration of insulin resistance in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: a randomised controlled trial

Hellgren, Margareta I., Jansson, Per-Anders, Wedel, Hans, Lindblad, Ulf·2016·Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

AIMS: We hypothesised that the expected increase in insulin resistance over three years' time in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and/or impaired fasting glucose could be attenuated by an intervention with focus on physical activity in ordinary primary care. METHODS: We conducted a randomised controlled trial with 96 participants over three years. Examination of the participants included anthropometric measures, blood pressure, body weight and height, blood samples, an oral glucose tolerance test, and questionnaires about diet and lifestyle. The study subjects were randomised to either an intense intervention with information, group sessions, referral to physical activity and a step-counter ( n = 31), a less intense intervention without the group sessions ( n = 35), or care as usual group (CAUG) ( n = 30). Differences between the groups were analysed with general linear models adjusted for age, gender, baseline values and time in the intervention. RESULTS: Individual insulin resistance increased in the CAUG. Due to having a similar effect, we combined the two intervention groups into a combined intervention group (CIG; n = 66) in the analyses. In individuals with IGT, the increase in the homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance differed significantly between those in the CAUG and the CIG (Δ = 0.8; CI: 0.1-1.6; p = 0.034). Likewise, diastolic blood pressure decreased more in the CIG than in the CAUG (Δ = 5.1; CI: 0.1-10.0; p = 0.047). A total of 17 individuals developed Type 2 diabetes, 23% were in the CIG and 33% in the CAUG; so there was a 32% reduced risk in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: A lifestyle intervention focused on physical activity is feasible in ordinary primary care and prevents deterioration in insulin sensitivity in individuals with IGT over a three-year period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1403494816663539

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hellgren, M. I., Jansson, P.-A., Wedel, H., & Lindblad, U.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Nordic School of Public Health (SE)
Corresponding author
Hellgren, Margareta I.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Published
2016-08-22
Volume
44
Issue
7
Pages
718-725
ISSN
  • 1403-4948 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-1905
OpenAlex
W2514799000
Cited by
23
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
lifestyle intervention, physical activity, insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose, type 2 diabetes prevention, primary care, step counter, group sessions, diastolic blood pressure, HOMA-IR

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review