CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 471Media and Digital CommunicationImpact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Communication and Language

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Interactions Across Media: Interpersonal Communication on the Internet, Telephone and Face-to-Face

Open access
Baym, Nancy K., Zhang, Yan Bing, Lin, Mei-Chen·2004·New Media & Society
DOI 10.1177/1461444804041438
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Two studies compared college students’ interpersonal interaction online, face-to-face, and on the telephone. A communication diary assessed the relative amount of social interactions college students conducted online compared to face-to-face conversation and telephone calls. Results indicated that while the internet was integrated into college students’ social lives, face-to-face communication remained the dominant mode of interaction. Participants reported using the internet as often as the telephone. A survey compared reported use of the internet within local and long distance social circles to the use of other media within those circles, and examined participants’ most recent significant social interactions conducted across media in terms of purposes, contexts, and quality. Internet interaction was perceived as high in quality, but slightly lower than other media. Results were compared to previous conceptualizations of the roles of internet in one’s social life.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1461444804041438

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 10.1093/hcr/27.1.153 · DOI
  2. La Rose, R., 2001, Journal of Online Behavior, 1
  3. Pew Project on the Internet and American Life, 2000, Tracking Online Life: How Women Use the Internet to Cultivate Relationships with Family and Friends
  4. Pew Project on the Internet and American Life, 2002, The Internet Goes to College: How Students Are Living in the Future
  5. UCLA Center for Communication Policy, 2000, Surveying the Digital Future
  6. UCLA Center for Communication Policy, 2001, Surveying the Digital Future
  7. UCLA Center for Communication Policy, 2002, Surveying the Digital Future

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Baym, N. K., Zhang, Y. B., & Lin, M.-C.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Baym, Nancy K.
ORCID
Venue
New Media & Society
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2004-06
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
299-318
ISSN
  • 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7315
DOI
10.1177/1461444804041438
OpenAlex
W2565744304
Cited by
471
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 19
FWCI
11.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • New Media & Society (publishedVersion)
  • KU ScholarWorks (University of Kansas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Digital Communication and Language
Keywords
online social interaction, face-to-face communication, telephone communication, university students, media use, interpersonal communication, communication quality, local social networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review