The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
User engagement with online news: Conceptualizing interactivity and exploring the relationship between online news videos and user comments
Abstract
With the emergence and rapid acceptance of online news come new and varied opportunities for user engagement with content, along with alternative metrics for capturing those behaviors. This study focuses on interactive engagement with online news videos. We propose a theoretical framework for conceptualizing user engagement on a continuum from exposure to interactivity. Furthermore, we make a distinction between user–content (e.g. commenting) and user–user (e.g. replying to another user’s comment) modes of interaction. We then explore publicly available measures of these concepts and test a series of hypotheses to explore commenting and conversational behaviors in response to YouTube news videos. We conclude by discussing the theoretical and practical implications for advancing our understanding of user engagement with online news.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century
Ruggiero, T. E. (2000) · Mass Communication and Society · doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0301_02 · Cited by 2,810 · cited 1×
“Ruggiero (2000) notes the potential for interactive media to fulfill certain psychological needs.”
BackgroundWhat is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology
O'Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20801 · Cited by 1,397
Interactivity: a concept explication
Kiousis, S. (2002) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/146144480200400303 · Cited by 666
Cited by
Right-Wing YouTube: A Supply and Demand Perspective
Munger, K., & Phillips, J. (2022) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161220964767 · Cited by 265
Data analytics of social media publicity to enhance household waste management
Jiang, P., Fan, Y. V., & Klemeš, J. J. (2021) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105146 · Cited by 73
Park, C. S., & Kaye, B. K. (2018) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699017753149 · Cited by 55
Jiang, P., Zhou, J., Fan, Y. V., Klemeš, J. J., Zheng, M., & Varbanov, P. S. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128809 · Cited by 38
Vázquez-Herrero, J., & López-García, X. (2019) · New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia · doi:10.1080/13614568.2019.1670270 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Ksiazek, T. B., Peer, L., & Lessard, K.
- Venue
- New Media & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-08-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 502-520
- ISSN
- 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7315
- OpenAlex
- W2006878426
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 34.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
