The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Seeing the forest for the trees: Visualizing platformization and its governance
Open accessAbstract
The complexities of platforms are increasingly at odds with the narrow legal and economic concepts in which their governance is grounded. This article aims to analyze platformization through the metaphorical lens of a tree to make sense of information ecosystems as hierarchical and interdependent structures. The layered shape of the tree draws attention to the dynamics of power concentration: vertical integration, infrastructuralization, and cross-sectorization. Next, the metaphor helps to revision the current patchwork of European regulatory frameworks, addressing the power asymmetry between citizens and the data-driven systems through which their daily practices are governed. Finally, the platformization tree serves to identify points of intervention that may inform European regulatory bodies and policy-makers to act as agents of change. Taking a holistic approach to platformization, this visual metaphor may inspire a set of principles that reshapes the platform ecosystem in the interest of society and the common good.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001 · Cited by 2,951
Gillespie, T. (2010) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444809342738 · Cited by 2,522 · cited 1×
“In the past, platforms have often been examined as metaphorical constructs with technological, social, economic, and political dimensions (Gillespie, 2010; Van Dijck, 2013).”
BackgroundData colonialism: rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019) · Television & New Media · doi:10.1177/1527476418796632 · Cited by 1,617
Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age
Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O., & Parker, G. G. (2018) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2018.0794 · Cited by 943 · cited 1×
“Yet other theorists configure constellations where stacks are partitioned into “core” and “peripheral” platforms (Constantinides et al., 2018).”
BackgroundSocial Media and the Public Interest: Media Regulation in the Disinformation Age
Napoli, P. (2019) · doi:10.7312/napo18454 · Cited by 332
Cited by
The US–China rivalry and the emergence of state platform capitalism
Rolf, S., & Schindler, S. (2023) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1177/0308518x221146545 · Cited by 167
“Dual‐Track” platform governance on content: A comparative study between China and United States
Liu, J., & Yang, L. (2022) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.307 · Cited by 48
Borderline practices on Douyin/TikTok: Content transfer and algorithmic manipulation
Su, C., & Valdovinos Kaye, B. (2023) · Media, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/01634437231168308 · Cited by 26
Cao, T. L. (2025) · Platforms & Society · doi:10.1177/29768624251349092 · Cited by 5
Build Agent Advocates, Not Platform Agents
Kapoor, S., Kolt, N., & Lazar, S. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.04345 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Dijck, J.
- Venue
- New Media & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-07-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2801-2819
- ISSN
- 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7315
- OpenAlex
- W3041898256
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 45.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
