The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Postfeminism, popular feminism and neoliberal feminism? Sarah Banet-Weiser, Rosalind Gill and Catherine Rottenberg in conversation
Open accessAbstract
In this unconventional article, Sarah Banet-Weiser, Rosalind Gill and Catherine Rottenberg conduct a three-way ‘conversation’ in which they all take turns outlining how they understand the relationship among postfeminism, popular feminism and neoliberal feminism. It begins with a short introduction, and then Ros, Sarah and Catherine each define the term they have become associated with. This is followed by another round in which they discuss the overlaps, similarities and disjunctures among the terms, and the article ends with how each one understands the current mediated feminist landscape.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution
Brown, W. (2015) · Zone Books · doi:10.2307/j.ctt17kk9p8 · Cited by 4,453
Ahmed, S. (2010) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822392781 · Cited by 3,286
The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home
Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (2012) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,230
Williams, R. (1961) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/will93760 · Cited by 3,220
The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change
McRobbie, Á. (2008) · Goldsmiths (University of London) · Cited by 2,802
Halberstam, J. (2011) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822394358 · Cited by 2,505
Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility
Gill, R. (2007) · European Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/1367549407075898 · Cited by 2,302
Self-citationScott, J. W. (1991) · Critical Inquiry · doi:10.1086/448612 · Cited by 2,258
The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture
Berlant, L. (2008) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822389163 · Cited by 1,574
The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling
Hochschild, A. R. (2003) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520930414 · Cited by 1,077
Cited by
“Victims of feminism”: exploring networked misogyny and #MeToo in the manosphere
Dickel, V., & Evolvi, G. (2023) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2022.2029925 · Cited by 122
“In doing so, and as also highlighted by Banet-Weiser et al. (2016), it”
BackgroundFeminist activism in digital space: Postfeminist contradictions in #WhyIStayed
Linabary, J. R., Corple, D. J., & Cooky, C. (2020) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819884635 · Cited by 66
‘A male dominance kind of vibe’: Approaching unsolicited dick pics as sexism
Amundsen, R. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444820907025 · Cited by 55
This hashtag is just my style: popular feminism & digital fashion activism
Horton, K., & Street, P. (2021) · Continuum · doi:10.1080/10304312.2021.1993573 · Cited by 11
Trimmel, T., Zhou, O. T., Zhang, M., & Ng, E. (2022) · Communication, Culture and Critique · doi:10.1093/ccc/tcac020 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Banet-Weiser, S., Gill, R., & Rottenberg, C.
- Venue
- Feminist Theory
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-04-23
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-24
- ISSN
- 1464-7001 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2773
- OpenAlex
- W2941531058
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 77.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Postfeminism, popular feminism and neoliberal feminism? Sarah Banet-Weiser, Rosalind Gill and Catherine Rottenberg in conversation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1464700119842555
- The paper
- Banet-Weiser, S., Gill, R., & Rottenberg, C. (2020). Postfeminism, popular feminism and neoliberal feminism? Sarah Banet-Weiser, Rosalind Gill and Catherine Rottenberg in conversation. Feminist Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700119842555
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
