Cited by 45Family Dynamics and RelationshipsFamily and Disability Support ResearchChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Parents’ perceived social support and children’s psychological adjustment

Nunes, Cristina, Martins, Cátia, Ayala-Nunes, Lara, Matos, Filomena, Costa, Emilia, Gonçalves, Andrea·2021·Journal of Social Work

Abstract

Summary Perceived social support has often been investigated due to its direct and indirect effects in reducing the impact of several risk factors on physical and psychological well-being. Moreover, many studies have revealed a link between social support and positive parenting, which in turn has an impact on children’s well-being. In Portugal, there is a significant lack of studies in this area. The aim of the present study was to analyze the relationship between parents’ perceived social support and children’s psychological adjustment. The sample consisted of 409 parents (83.13% mothers) living in the region of Algarve (South of Portugal). The Duke-UNC Functional Social Support and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires were used. Findings The results showed that, on average, families had a social support network of nine people, with a balanced presence of family ( M = 4.25, SD = 3.54) and friends ( M = 4.36, SD = 3.17). Parents reported medium-high levels of confidant and affective support, but instrumental support was lower. However, single-parent families, immigrant families, and divorced parents were found to be more socially isolated and received less support than they needed. Affective social support showed predictive value for child psychological adjustment. Applications These findings suggest that developing universal and selective parental education and support programs that focus on strengthening informal social support networks is needed, especially for vu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1468017320911614

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nunes, C., Martins, C., Ayala-Nunes, L., Matos, F., Costa, E., & Gonçalves, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Algarve (PT)
  • Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, England
  • Centro de Estudos e Desenvolvimento em Saúde, Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal
Corresponding author
Nunes, Cristina
Venue
Journal of Social Work
Published
2020-03-18
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
497-512
ISSN
  • 1468-0173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-296X
OpenAlex
W3010857414
Cited by
45
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Social Work (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
Funders
FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (CIP/UAL - Refª UID/PSI/04345/2019)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
perceived social support, child adjustment, parental support, emotional support, instrumental support, social isolation, single-parent families, immigrant families, divorced parents, family support networks, vulnerable families, Algarve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review